Kyle Edmund vs Steve Johnson — Winston-Salem Quarter-final

Winston-Salem · ATP · Quarter-final
GBR
Kyle Edmund
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 August 2017
hard
USA6
Steve Johnson
36 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWWLL
Edmund K.
5-7 6-3 6-3
Johnson S.
Edmund K.
5662
Johnson S.
7331

Kyle Edmund defeated Steve Johnson 5-7 6-3 6-3 in the Winston-Salem quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Steve Johnson came in leading the head-to-head 2–1, defending last year's round of 16. Kyle Edmund narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-08-20Winston-SalemQFhardSteve Johnson6-1 6-2
2017-08-28US OpenR64hardKyle Edmund7-5 6-2 7-6(4)
2015-01-19Australian OpenR128hardSteve Johnson6-4 6-4 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Edmund K.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Johnson S.

Johnson S.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Edmund K.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Edmund K.Johnson S.
1st serve in·Even
59%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
65%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
34%
Break points saved·Even
60%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.9
8.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Edmund K.Johnson S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
52
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
97
Break points won·Clear edge
22
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
25
64
Tiebreaks·Dominant
36
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bautista Agut R.[1]
Dzumhur D.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Dzumhur D.
Edmund K.
1-67-56-3
Bautista Agut R.[1]
Struff J.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Dzumhur D.
Chung H.[13]
6-46-2
Edmund K.
Johnson S.[6]
5-76-36-3
Struff J.
Coric B.[14]
6-47-62
Bautista Agut R.[1]
Fritz T.
6-27-63
R16
Dzumhur D.
Zeballos H.
7-56-3
Edmund K.
Fucsovics M.
6-26-1
Johnson S.[6]
Berlocq C.
7-616-4
Struff J.
Seppi A.
6-36-737-63
Coric B.[14]
Isner J.[3]
7-56-2
Bautista Agut R.[1]
Baghdatis M.
6-36-4
Chung H.[13]
Benneteau J.
6-41-1
Fritz T.
Lorenzi P.[7]
7-637-65
R32
Benneteau J.
Carreno Busta P.[2]
7-656-756-3
Chung H.[13]
Rublev A.
5-76-16-1
Dzumhur D.
Simon G.[9]
6-41-66-4
Zeballos H.
Verdasco F.[8]
3-67-56-4
Fucsovics M.
Sousa J.[17]
6-33-66-1
Berlocq C.
Troicki V.[11]
3-66-16-2
Johnson S.[6]
Lu Y.
6-46-3
Struff J.
Cuevas P.[5]
7-627-5
Seppi A.
Bedene A.[12]
6-47-5
Coric B.[14]
Young D.
4-66-46-2
Isner J.[3]
Kuznetsov A.
2-67-656-3
Lorenzi P.[7]
Monteiro T.
2-66-46-4
Fritz T.
Sugita Y.[10]
6-36-2
Baghdatis M.
Vesely J.[16]
6-27-63
Bautista Agut R.[1]
Lajovic D.
6-46-3
Edmund K.
Medvedev D.[15]
2-66-27-66
R64
Benneteau J.
Herbert P.
6-36-2
Rublev A.
Darcis S.
6-46-4
Dzumhur D.
Istomin D.
6-46-4
Zeballos H.
Koepfer D.
6-26-1
Fucsovics M.
Gulbis E.
7-616-2
Edmund K.
Fabbiano T.
6-26-3
Berlocq C.
Bolt A.
6-26-4
Lu Y.
Eysseric J.
6-26-1
Seppi A.
Tipsarevic J.
6-26-2
Young D.
Dutra Silva R.
6-46-2
Kuznetsov A.
Kicker N.
7-56-2
Monteiro T.
Dolgopolov A.
6-36-3
Fritz T.
Jaziri M.
4-66-46-3
Baghdatis M.
Berankis R.
7-57-5
Lajovic D.
Chrysochos P.
6-26-3
Struff J.
Gombos N.
7-637-64