Taro Daniel vs Noah Rubin — Vancouver CH Round of 32

Vancouver CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Taro Daniel
JPN6
Taro Daniel
#194ATP
1567ELO
1512Hard ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 August 2017
hard
USA
Noah Rubin
30 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
Daniel T.
7-5 6-4
Rubin N.
Daniel T.
762
Rubin N.
540

Taro Daniel defeated Noah Rubin 7-5 6-4 in the Vancouver CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Taro Daniel came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Taro Daniel extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-08-01WashingtonQ1hardTaro Daniel6-2 6-0

Serve vs return

This season
Daniel T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Rubin N.

Rubin N.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Daniel T.Rubin N.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Even
4.0
3.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 189). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Daniel T.Rubin N.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
42
49
Break points saved·Clear edge
93
80
Break points won·Slight edge
37
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
18
54
Tiebreaks·Even
81
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Daniel T.Rubin N.
Freshness·
59
—

Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 83 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Stebe C.
Thompson J.[2]
6-06-1
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[2]
Napolitano S.
6-06-1
Stebe C.
De Loore J.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
De Loore J.
Broady L.
7-687-64
Thompson J.[2]
Schnur B.
6-44-66-1
Napolitano S.
Harris L.
4-66-36-3
Stebe C.
Fritz T.
4-67-656-2
R16
Thompson J.[2]
Purcell M.
6-16-3
Schnur B.
Daniel T.[6]
2-66-27-5
Harris L.
Ofner S.
6-46-4
Napolitano S.
Bemelmans R.[7]
7-53-66-4
Fritz T.
Sandgren T.[8]
6-26-2
Stebe C.
Millman J.
4-67-57-5
De Loore J.
Halys Q.
6-34-66-3
Broady L.
Sela D.[1]
7-627-610
R32
De Loore J.
Laaksonen H.[5]
6-30-1
Thompson J.[2]
Sigouin B.
6-06-1
Purcell M.
Bonzi B.
7-56-4
Schnur B.
Sakharov G.
6-47-62
Daniel T.[6]
Rubin N.
7-56-4
Harris L.
Gombos N.[4]
7-56-2
Ofner S.
Hanfmann Y.
7-56-3
Napolitano S.
Aragone J.
6-17-5
Bemelmans R.[7]
Bester P.
7-666-4
Sandgren T.[8]
Lee D.
7-57-65
Fritz T.
Garanganga T.
6-36-2
Stebe C.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-46-4
Millman J.
Copil M.[3]
7-57-5
Halys Q.
Shane R.
7-626-3
Broady L.
Polmans M.
1-66-36-4
Sela D.[1]
Peliwo F.
7-646-2