Jason Jung vs Cameron Norrie — Aptos CH Round of 32

Aptos CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jason Jung
TPE
Jason Jung
#896ATP
1420ELO
1389Hard ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 August 2017
hard
Cameron Norrie
GBR
Cameron Norrie
#38ATP
1829ELO
1789Hard ELO
$963kYTD
$15MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
Jung J.
7-5 6-4
Norrie C.
Jung J.
762
Norrie C.
540

Jason Jung defeated Cameron Norrie 7-5 6-4 in the Aptos CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Cameron Norrie came in ranked #38, defending last year's final. Jason Jung extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-02-10New YorkR16hardJason Jung6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Jung J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Norrie C.

Norrie C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Jung J.Norrie C.
—
Serve
45
—
Return
34

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Jung J.Norrie C.
1st serve in·Even
64%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.8
5.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jung J.Norrie C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
21
90
Break points saved·Dominant
64
99
Break points won·Dominant
8
83
Deciding sets·Dominant
21
98
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
69
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Jung J.Norrie C.
Freshness·Clear edge
78
100

Jung J.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d) · Norrie C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Bublik A.
Broady L.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Bublik A.
Groth S.
7-626-3
Broady L.
Fritz T.
7-636-3
Quarter-finals
Fritz T.
Sandgren T.[6]
7-57-61
Groth S.
Santillan A.
7-57-66
Bublik A.
Novikov D.
6-16-4
Broady L.
Sarmiento R.
6-46-4
R16
Santillan A.
King D.
6-36-4
Groth S.
Jung J.
4-66-36-0
Bublik A.
Laaksonen H.[3]
6-16-1
Novikov D.
Kukushkin M.[5]
6-737-636-3
Sarmiento R.
Halys Q.
6-44-66-3
Broady L.
De Loore J.
6-26-2
Sandgren T.[6]
Mcdonald M.
6-16-2
Fritz T.
Krajicek A.
2-66-16-2
R32
Santillan A.
Thompson J.[2]
6-45-76-2
King D.
Rungkat C.
6-26-3
Jung J.
Norrie C.
7-56-4
Groth S.
Fratangelo B.[8]
6-756-46-3
Laaksonen H.[3]
Ramanathan R.
6-36-2
Novikov D.
Sakharov G.
6-46-4
Kukushkin M.[5]
Gabashvili T.
6-46-4
Halys Q.
Ruud C.[7]
6-43-66-3
Sarmiento R.
Rubin N.
7-656-2
De Loore J.
Lamble J.
6-36-1
Broady L.
Bemelmans R.[4]
3-66-46-2
Sandgren T.[6]
Nielsen F.
6-26-4
Mcdonald M.
Millman J.
6-736-46-0
Fritz T.
Kravchuk K.
6-36-4
Krajicek A.
Jaziri M.[1]
6-26-1
Bublik A.
Krueger M.
6-32-66-4