Caroline Dolehide vs Naomi OsakaStanford Round of 32

Stanford · WTA · Round of 32
#265WTA
1673ELO
1638Hard ELO
27 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 July 2017
hard
#13WTA
1987ELO
1922Hard ELO
$1.1MYTD
$26MCAREER
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
Dolehide C.
6-4 6-2
Osaka N.
Dolehide C.
662
Osaka N.
420

Caroline Dolehide defeated Naomi Osaka 6-4 6-2 in the Stanford round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Naomi Osaka came in ranked #13, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Dolehide C.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Osaka N.

Osaka N.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Dolehide C.

Serve advantage — Osaka N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Dolehide C.Osaka N.
Serve
70
Return
60

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Clear edge
70%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
63%
Return points won·Even
42%
42%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.7
6.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.8
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 196). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
36
91
Break points saved·Slight edge
87
96
Break points won·Dominant
57
97
Deciding sets·Dominant
17
99
Tiebreaks·Dominant
67
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·Slight edge
95
88

Dolehide C.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d) · Osaka N.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast