Cameron Norrie vs Daniel Nguyen — Binghamton CH Round of 16

Binghamton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Cameron Norrie
GBR
Cameron Norrie
#38ATP
1829ELO
1789Hard ELO
$963kYTD
$15MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 July 2017
hard
USA
Daniel Nguyen
35 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLWW
Norrie C.
6-3 6-3
Nguyen D.
Norrie C.
662
Nguyen D.
330

Cameron Norrie defeated Daniel Nguyen 6-3 6-3 in the Binghamton CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Daniel Nguyen came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Norrie C.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Nguyen D.

Nguyen D.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Norrie C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Norrie C.Nguyen D.
45
Serve
—
34
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Norrie C.Nguyen D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
58%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.2
3.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.3
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Norrie C.Nguyen D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
21
Break points saved·Dominant
99
37
Break points won·Dominant
83
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
59
Tiebreaks·Dominant
89
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Norrie C.Nguyen D.
Freshness·
100
—

Norrie C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Norrie C.
Thompson J.[1]
6-40-66-4
Semi-finals
Norrie C.
Harrison C.
6-26-2
Thompson J.[1]
Blumberg W.
4-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Harrison C.
Bublik A.[2]
6-46-727-5
Norrie C.
Rola B.[8]
3-66-46-4
Blumberg W.
Zhang Z.
W/O
Thompson J.[1]
Koepfer D.
6-26-3
R16
Bublik A.[2]
King K.
2-66-36-3
Harrison C.
Mmoh M.[5]
6-46-3
Norrie C.
Nguyen D.
6-36-3
Rola B.[8]
Bolt A.
6-36-2
Blumberg W.
Kudla D.[6]
6-36-2
Koepfer D.
Corrie E.
7-626-4
Thompson J.[1]
Rybakov A.
6-36-3
Zhang Z.
Santillan A.[4]
6-44-1
R32
King K.
Sarmiento R.
2-67-687-5
Harrison C.
Quigley E.
6-36-746-4
Mmoh M.[5]
Giron M.
7-57-5
Norrie C.
Ramanathan R.[3]
7-636-2
Nguyen D.
Holt B.
6-32-66-3
Bolt A.
Leshem E.
6-36-2
Rola B.[8]
Aragone J.
6-47-62
Kudla D.[6]
Sorgi J.
6-26-4
Blumberg W.
Saville L.
7-56-3
Zhang Z.
Statham J.
6-47-64
Santillan A.[4]
Song E.
3-67-646-0
Koepfer D.
Whittington A.[7]
6-45-76-2
Corrie E.
Bar D.
6-36-2
Rybakov A.
El Mihdawy A.
6-36-2
Thompson J.[1]
King E.
7-616-4
Bublik A.[2]
Farren C.
7-54-67-5