Tommy Paul vs Malek Jaziri — Atlanta Round of 16

Atlanta · ATP · Round of 16
Tommy Paul
USA
Tommy Paul
#24ATP
1949ELO
1881Hard ELO
$1.7MYTD
$15MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 July 2017
hard
TUN
Malek Jaziri
42 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Paul T.
6-7 6-4 6-3
Jaziri M.
Paul T.
65662
Jaziri M.
77431

Tommy Paul defeated Malek Jaziri 6-7 6-4 6-3 in the Atlanta round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Paul T.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Jaziri M.

Jaziri M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Paul T.

Serve advantage — Paul T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Paul T.Jaziri M.
71
Serve
—
54
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Paul T.Jaziri M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
54%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.2
3.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Paul T.Jaziri M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
93
31
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
83
Break points won·Dominant
87
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
55
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
14

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Paul T.Jaziri M.
Freshness·
88
—

Paul T.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Isner J.[2]
Harrison R.[4]
7-667-67
Semi-finals
Isner J.[2]
Muller G.[3]
6-46-2
Harrison R.[4]
Edmund K.[5]
6-756-36-4
Quarter-finals
Isner J.[2]
Lacko L.
7-56-4
Muller G.[3]
Paul T.
6-36-1
Harrison R.[4]
Eubanks C.
6-16-2
Edmund K.[5]
Sock J.[1]
6-46-1
R16
Isner J.[2]
Pospisil V.
6-36-4
Lacko L.
Young D.[6]
6-36-1
Muller G.[3]
Halys Q.
6-46-716-3
Paul T.
Jaziri M.
6-756-46-3
Eubanks C.
Donaldson J.[8]
6-44-66-2
Harrison R.[4]
Millman J.
6-727-647-5
Edmund K.[5]
Gojowczyk P.
2-66-47-5
Sock J.[1]
Sela D.
6-46-3
R32
Paul T.
Chung H.[7]
4-66-26-3
Pospisil V.
Fratangelo B.
7-54-67-63
Lacko L.
Fabbiano T.
6-16-2
Young D.[6]
Smyczek T.
6-46-2
Halys Q.
Kozlov S.
7-57-67
Jaziri M.
Opelka R.
5-77-6146-1
Donaldson J.[8]
Escobedo E.
6-36-1
Eubanks C.
Fritz T.
7-656-4
Millman J.
Tiafoe F.
5-76-47-65
Edmund K.[5]
Baghdatis M.
6-37-5
Gojowczyk P.
Pella G.
4-66-37-65
Sela D.
Kravchuk K.
7-56-2