Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Gastao Elias — Scheveningen CH Round of 16

Scheveningen CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#55ATP
1743ELO
1690Clay ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 July 2017
clay
Gastao Elias
POR3
Gastao Elias
#728ATP
1447ELO
1425Clay ELO
35 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
Van De Zandschulp B.
2-6 6-1 6-3
Elias G.
Van De Zandschulp B.
2662
Elias G.
6131

Botic Van De Zandschulp defeated Gastao Elias 2-6 6-1 6-3 in the Scheveningen CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Botic Van De Zandschulp came in ranked #55.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Elias G.

Elias G.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Van De Zandschulp B.Elias G.
26
Serve
—
74
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.Elias G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.6
3.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van De Zandschulp B.Elias G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
77
37
Break points saved·Dominant
98
57
Break points won·Dominant
68
24
Deciding sets·Slight edge
79
86
Tiebreaks·Dominant
80
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Van De Zandschulp B.Elias G.
Freshness·
95
—

Van De Zandschulp B.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Garcia Lopez G.[6]
Bemelmans R.[5]
6-16-736-2
Semi-finals
Bemelmans R.[5]
Tepavac M.
6-26-1
Garcia Lopez G.[6]
De Bakker T.
4-3
Quarter-finals
De Bakker T.
Tsitsipas S.
6-16-4
Tepavac M.
De Loore J.
7-634-66-3
Bemelmans R.[5]
Bolelli S.
6-26-4
Garcia Lopez G.[6]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-46-3
R16
Tepavac M.
Krajinovic F.
2-66-36-2
De Loore J.
Cervantes Huegun I.
6-26-3
Bolelli S.
Stakhovsky S.[4]
6-43-66-3
Bemelmans R.[5]
Sakharov G.
6-32-66-3
Garcia Lopez G.[6]
Gonzalez M.
5-76-36-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Elias G.[3]
2-66-16-3
Tsitsipas S.
Kovalik J.[8]
7-56-1
De Bakker T.
Bellotti R.
6-46-7116-2
R32
Krajinovic F.
Daniel T.[2]
7-57-62
Tepavac M.
Gimeno Traver D.
6-36-4
Cervantes Huegun I.
Verbeek S.
6-36-4
De Loore J.
Souza J.[7]
7-654-66-3
Stakhovsky S.[4]
Von Massow G.
7-656-2
Bolelli S.
De Krom M.
6-06-3
Sakharov G.
Banes M.
7-643-66-4
Bemelmans R.[5]
Ofner S.
6-26-0
Garcia Lopez G.[6]
Griekspoor T.
6-41-66-2
Gonzalez M.
Geens C.
6-46-2
Kovalik J.[8]
Brands D.
6-37-64
Bellotti R.
Londero J.
4-66-17-62
De Bakker T.
Haase R.[1]
7-676-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Mertens Y.
4-66-36-2
Elias G.[3]
Basic M.
5-76-36-4
Tsitsipas S.
Domingues J.
7-636-4