Casper Ruud vs Tim Puetz — Marburg CH Round of 32

Marburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Casper Ruud
NOR1
Casper Ruud
#13ATP
1983ELO
1973Clay ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 July 2017
clay
GER
Tim Puetz
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLLLL
Ruud C.
6-2 6-7 6-2
Puetz T.
Ruud C.
66462
Puetz T.
27721

Casper Ruud defeated Tim Puetz 6-2 6-7 6-2 in the Marburg CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Casper Ruud closed it out in three sets, 6–2 6–7 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ruud C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Puetz T.

Puetz T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ruud C.Puetz T.
58
Serve
—
70
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ruud C.Puetz T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
53%
Service points won·Even
66%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
66%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.7
7.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 63). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruud C.Puetz T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
27
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
80
Break points won·Dominant
75
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
36
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
21

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ruud C.Puetz T.
Freshness·
100
—

Ruud C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Krajinovic F.
Stebe C.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Krajinovic F.
Garcia Lopez G.[6]
7-56-4
Stebe C.
De Greef A.[3]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Krajinovic F.
Bachinger M.
7-56-1
Garcia Lopez G.[6]
Sorgi J.
6-44-66-3
De Greef A.[3]
Bonzi B.
6-27-5
Stebe C.
Hanfmann Y.
6-46-3
R16
Stebe C.
Hemery C.
7-6107-65
Garcia Lopez G.[6]
Bellotti R.
7-51-66-2
Bachinger M.
Otte O.
2-66-36-3
Krajinovic F.
Martin A.[7]
6-26-4
Sorgi J.
Ignatik U.[4]
7-616-2
Bonzi B.
Safranek V.
6-34-66-4
De Greef A.[3]
Gonzalez M.
7-57-5
Hanfmann Y.
Ruud C.[1]
6-47-61
R32
Bachinger M.
Lopez Perez E.
6-36-3
Krajinovic F.
Fermosell Delgado J.
6-36-1
Ignatik U.[4]
Robredo T.
7-667-5
Sorgi J.
Giustino L.
6-746-37-62
Bellotti R.
Reuter Y.
2-66-16-4
Garcia Lopez G.[6]
Pichler D.
4-67-57-67
Bonzi B.
Satral J.[5]
6-46-1
Safranek V.
Coria F.
4-67-56-1
Gonzalez M.
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
6-23-66-1
De Greef A.[3]
Hassan B.
7-56-3
Hemery C.
Gaio F.[8]
4-66-36-1
Stebe C.
Lenz J.
6-37-66
Hanfmann Y.
Balazs A.
7-56-1
Ruud C.[1]
Puetz T.
6-26-746-2
Otte O.
Pella G.[2]
6-46-3
Martin A.[7]
Wehnelt K.
6-36-3