Marco Cecchinato vs Jonathan Eysseric — Milan CH Round of 16

Milan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Marco Cecchinato
ITA1
Marco Cecchinato
#175ATP
1576ELO
1546Clay ELO
$149kYTD
$5.3MCAREER
33 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 June 2017
clay
FRA
Jonathan Eysseric
36 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
Cecchinato M.
6-7 7-6 6-1
Eysseric J.
Cecchinato M.
627762
Eysseric J.
776411

Marco Cecchinato defeated Jonathan Eysseric 6-7 7-6 6-1 in the Milan CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Marco Cecchinato came in defending the title.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cecchinato M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Eysseric J.

Eysseric J.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Cecchinato M.

Serve advantage — Cecchinato M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cecchinato M.Eysseric J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
45%
Service points won·Even
61%
57%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cecchinato M.Eysseric J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
42
0
Break points saved·Dominant
89
26
Break points won·Even
20
18
Deciding sets·Clear edge
36
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Cecchinato M.Eysseric J.
Freshness·
69
—

Cecchinato M.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 37 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Pella G.[5]
Delbonis F.[3]
6-22-1
Semi-finals
Pella G.[5]
Robredo T.
6-36-4
Delbonis F.[3]
Cecchinato M.[1]
6-14-66-0
Quarter-finals
Robredo T.
Hernandez J.
6-36-4
Pella G.[5]
Mager G.
6-16-1
Delbonis F.[3]
Ignatik U.[7]
6-16-4
Cecchinato M.[1]
Londero J.
6-26-3
R16
Robredo T.
Clezar G.
6-757-636-3
Hernandez J.
Popko D.[8]
6-26-3
Mager G.
Rola B.
6-46-726-0
Pella G.[5]
Krstin P.
5-76-16-1
Ignatik U.[7]
Di Nicola G.
6-46-4
Delbonis F.[3]
Kolar Z.
6-35-76-4
Londero J.
Collarini A.
3-67-56-4
Cecchinato M.[1]
Eysseric J.
6-727-646-1
R32
Clezar G.
Monteiro T.[2]
6-36-3
Robredo T.
Munoz de la Nava D.
6-26-4
Hernandez J.
Lestienne C.
7-56-776-3
Rola B.
Elias G.[4]
6-33-66-4
Mager G.
Lokoli L.
3-67-56-3
Krstin P.
Paz J.
6-26-2
Pella G.[5]
Martinez P.
6-17-65
Ignatik U.[7]
Sorgi J.
6-46-4
Di Nicola G.
Leshem E.
6-24-66-1
Kolar Z.
Bolt A.
7-56-4
Delbonis F.[3]
Oconnell C.
6-36-1
Londero J.
Frigerio L.
6-36-1
Eysseric J.
Hamou M.
6-11-66-3
Cecchinato M.[1]
Grigelis L.
5-77-57-65
Popko D.[8]
Caruana L.
6-30-0
Collarini A.
De Greef A.[6]
6-35-2