Andrey Rublev vs Miljan Zekic — Caltanissetta CH Round of 32

Caltanissetta CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Andrey Rublev
RUS
Andrey Rublev
#16ATP
1902ELO
1872Clay ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 June 2017
clay
SRB
Miljan Zekic
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWW
Rublev A.
6-3 6-4
Zekic M.
Rublev A.
662
Zekic M.
340

Andrey Rublev defeated Miljan Zekic 6-3 6-4 in the Caltanissetta CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Miljan Zekic came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 32, but Andrey Rublev had been the form player, winning 6 of their last 8 on clay. Andrey Rublev claimed a first win over Miljan Zekic in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Andrey Rublev closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-08-29US OpenQ1hardMiljan Zekic6-7(4) 7-6(5) 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Rublev A.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Zekic M.

Zekic M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Serve advantage — Rublev A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Rublev A.Zekic M.
13
Serve
—
64
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Rublev A.Zekic M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.9
3.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 185). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rublev A.Zekic M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
88
22
Break points saved·Dominant
100
36
Break points won·Dominant
72
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
97
68
Tiebreaks·Dominant
92
36

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Rublev A.Zekic M.
Freshness·
100
—

Rublev A.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Lorenzi P.[1]
Giannessi A.[7]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Giannessi A.[7]
Stebe C.
6-37-65
Lorenzi P.[1]
Albot R.[4]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Stebe C.
Cecchinato M.[6]
6-16-2
Giannessi A.[7]
Kukushkin M.[3]
6-41-66-1
Albot R.[4]
Sandgren T.[8]
6-33-67-64
Lorenzi P.[1]
Andreozzi G.
6-23-66-4
R16
Stebe C.
Travaglia S.
6-737-666-3
Cecchinato M.[6]
Rublev A.
7-53-66-3
Kukushkin M.[3]
Ramanathan R.
6-06-2
Sandgren T.[8]
Bolelli S.
3-66-46-4
Albot R.[4]
Bellotti R.
2-66-46-4
Andreozzi G.
Bagnis F.[5]
7-57-65
Lorenzi P.[1]
Djere L.
6-766-36-2
Giannessi A.[7]
Cervantes Huegun I.
6-26-3
R32
Cervantes Huegun I.
Berrettini M.
3-66-27-5
Andreozzi G.
Vatutin A.
6-16-4
Cecchinato M.[6]
Samper Montana J.
4-67-56-1
Kukushkin M.[3]
Mager G.
6-46-0
Giannessi A.[7]
Lopez Perez E.
7-57-5
Sandgren T.[8]
Safranek V.
6-24-66-2
Bolelli S.
Sorgi J.
7-56-2
Bellotti R.
Gaio F.
6-36-0
Albot R.[4]
Mcgee J.
6-27-5
Bagnis F.[5]
Kovalik J.
6-46-4
Djere L.
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-3
Lorenzi P.[1]
Arevalo M.
7-56-4
Stebe C.
Lajovic D.[2]
6-26-2
Travaglia S.
Caruso S.
7-56-2
Rublev A.
Zekic M.
6-36-4
Ramanathan R.
Ofner S.
6-24-67-66