Thomas Fabbiano vs Sergiy Stakhovsky — Nottingham CH Quarter-final

Nottingham CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ITA4
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 June 2017
grass
UKR
Sergiy Stakhovsky
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLLW
Fabbiano T.
4-6 6-2 7-6
Stakhovsky S.
Fabbiano T.
46772
Stakhovsky S.
62651

Thomas Fabbiano defeated Sergiy Stakhovsky 4-6 6-2 7-6 in the Nottingham CH quarter-final on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Sergiy Stakhovsky came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Thomas Fabbiano claimed a first win over Sergiy Stakhovsky in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-02-20MarseilleQ2hardSergiy Stakhovsky3-6 7-6(3) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Fabbiano T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Stakhovsky S.

Stakhovsky S.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fabbiano T.Stakhovsky S.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
48%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.0
7.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fabbiano T.Stakhovsky S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
28
40
Break points saved·Slight edge
81
88
Break points won·Clear edge
16
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
28
57
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
44
59

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Sela D.[3]
Fabbiano T.[4]
4-66-46-3
Semi-finals
Fabbiano T.[4]
Groth S.
6-46-3
Sela D.[3]
Copil M.[2]
7-641-0
Quarter-finals
Copil M.[2]
Fratangelo B.
7-656-4
Sela D.[3]
Glasspool L.
6-27-64
Fabbiano T.[4]
Stakhovsky S.
4-66-27-65
Groth S.
Smith J.
7-666-2
R16
Copil M.[2]
Opelka R.
6-37-62
Fratangelo B.
De Schepper K.
6-46-4
Sela D.[3]
Berankis R.
6-36-4
Glasspool L.
Polmans M.
6-26-3
Stakhovsky S.
Marchenko I.[8]
6-47-69
Fabbiano T.[4]
Bhambri Y.
7-686-0
Smith J.
Millman J.
7-632-66-3
Groth S.
Klein B.
6-36-4
R32
Opelka R.
Mmoh M.
7-626-4
De Schepper K.
Norrie C.
7-55-76-4
Fratangelo B.
King D.[6]
6-756-27-61
Sela D.[3]
Kudla D.
6-26-2
Berankis R.
Kamke T.
6-44-66-4
Polmans M.
Whittington A.
6-46-4
Glasspool L.
Soeda G.[5]
6-26-2
Marchenko I.[8]
Broady L.
7-56-2
Stakhovsky S.
Santillan A.
6-47-64
Bhambri Y.
Clarke J.
7-626-1
Fabbiano T.[4]
Shapovalov D.
6-46-716-3
Smith J.
Vanni L.[7]
4-67-657-61
Millman J.
Moriya H.
6-36-2
Groth S.
Polansky P.
6-37-68
Klein B.
De Minaur A.
7-656-3
Copil M.[2]
Kravchuk K.
6-36-4