Marius Copil vs Reilly Opelka — Nottingham CH Round of 16

Nottingham CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ROU2
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 June 2017
grass
Reilly Opelka
USA
Reilly Opelka
#131ATP
1749ELO
1635Grass ELO
$325kYTD
$6.0MCAREER
28 yrs · 211 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLW
Copil M.
6-3 7-6
Opelka R.
Copil M.
6772
Opelka R.
3620

Marius Copil defeated Reilly Opelka 6-3 7-6 in the Nottingham CH round of 16 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Reilly Opelka came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Marius Copil claimed a first win over Reilly Opelka in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Marius Copil closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-03-20Miami MastersQ1hardReilly Opelka6-4 7-6(3)

Serve vs return

This season
Copil M.serving97% hold

wins 79% of points on serve vs Opelka R.

Opelka R.serving96% hold

wins 77% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Copil M.Opelka R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
70%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
28%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
70%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.6
17.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Copil M.Opelka R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
47
63
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
100
Break points won·Even
3
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
63
88
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
79
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Sela D.[3]
Fabbiano T.[4]
4-66-46-3
Semi-finals
Fabbiano T.[4]
Groth S.
6-46-3
Sela D.[3]
Copil M.[2]
7-641-0
Quarter-finals
Copil M.[2]
Fratangelo B.
7-656-4
Sela D.[3]
Glasspool L.
6-27-64
Fabbiano T.[4]
Stakhovsky S.
4-66-27-65
Groth S.
Smith J.
7-666-2
R16
Copil M.[2]
Opelka R.
6-37-62
Fratangelo B.
De Schepper K.
6-46-4
Sela D.[3]
Berankis R.
6-36-4
Glasspool L.
Polmans M.
6-26-3
Stakhovsky S.
Marchenko I.[8]
6-47-69
Fabbiano T.[4]
Bhambri Y.
7-686-0
Smith J.
Millman J.
7-632-66-3
Groth S.
Klein B.
6-36-4
R32
Opelka R.
Mmoh M.
7-626-4
De Schepper K.
Norrie C.
7-55-76-4
Fratangelo B.
King D.[6]
6-756-27-61
Sela D.[3]
Kudla D.
6-26-2
Berankis R.
Kamke T.
6-44-66-4
Polmans M.
Whittington A.
6-46-4
Glasspool L.
Soeda G.[5]
6-26-2
Marchenko I.[8]
Broady L.
7-56-2
Stakhovsky S.
Santillan A.
6-47-64
Bhambri Y.
Clarke J.
7-626-1
Fabbiano T.[4]
Shapovalov D.
6-46-716-3
Smith J.
Vanni L.[7]
4-67-657-61
Millman J.
Moriya H.
6-36-2
Groth S.
Polansky P.
6-37-68
Klein B.
De Minaur A.
7-656-3
Copil M.[2]
Kravchuk K.
6-36-4