Mirjana Lucic vs Lucie Safarova — Rome Round of 64
Rome · WTA · Round of 64
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 May 2017
clay
Lucic M.7-5 4-6 6-3
Safarova L.
Lucic M.
7462
Safarova L.
5631
Mirjana Lucic defeated Lucie Safarova 7-5 4-6 6-3 in the Rome round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Lucie Safarova came in leading the head-to-head 4–0, defending last year's round of 32. Mirjana Lucic claimed a first win over Lucie Safarova in five meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 4–1.
Key context
- Match story: Mirjana Lucic closed it out in three sets, 7–5 4–6 6–3.
Head to head
0–4| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-09-09 | Quebec City | R16 | hard | Lucie Safarova | 7-6(4) 7-6(10) |
| 2013-04-01 | Charleston | R32 | clay | Lucie Safarova | 7-5 6-1 |
| 2013-01-14 | Australian Open | R128 | hard | Lucie Safarova | 7-6(4) 6-4 |
| 2012-04-02 | Charleston | R32 | clay | Lucie Safarova | 6-2 6-0 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Safarova L.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
41%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
55%
62%
Return points won·Even
45%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.9
5.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
6.5
3.9
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (42 vs 76). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
28
44
Break points saved·Dominant
45
89
Break points won·Dominant
79
50
Deciding sets·Even
43
47
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
27
50
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
26°CClear
Wind 12 km/hHumidity 41%
Draw
Quarter-finals
Svitolina E.[8]
Pliskova K.[2]
6-27-69
Muguruza G.[3]
Williams V.[9]
6-23-66-2
Bertens K.[15]
Saville D.
6-36-3
Halep S.[6]
Kontaveit A.
6-26-4
R16
Svitolina E.[8]
Barthel M.
3-66-06-0
Muguruza G.[3]
Goerges J.
7-56-4
Williams V.[9]
Konta J.[5]
6-13-66-1
Saville D.
Kuznetsova S.[7]
2-67-56-4
Bertens K.[15]
Makarova K.
7-636-1
Halep S.[6]
Pavlyuchenkova A.[12]
6-14-66-0
Kontaveit A.
Lucic M.[16]
6-16-1
Pliskova K.[2]
Bacsinszky T.
6-17-5
R32
Pliskova K.[2]
Davis L.
6-16-1
Bacsinszky T.
Strycova B.[14]
6-46-2
Barthel M.
Wang Q.
6-36-4
Svitolina E.[8]
Cornet A.
6-47-611
Muguruza G.[3]
Ostapenko J.
2-66-26-1
Goerges J.
Jankovic J.
2-67-626-1
Williams V.[9]
Tsurenko L.
6-46-3
Konta J.[5]
Putintseva Y.
6-36-0
Kuznetsova S.[7]
Siniakova K.
6-17-63
Saville D.
Garcia C.
7-53-66-3
Bertens K.[15]
Bellis C.
6-46-0
Makarova K.
Cibulkova D.[4]
1-66-16-3
Halep S.[6]
Siegemund L.
6-46-4
Pavlyuchenkova A.[12]
Sevastova A.
7-646-2
Kontaveit A.
Kerber A.[1]
6-46-0
Lucic M.[16]
Sharapova M.
6-43-61-2
R64
Davis L.
Suarez Navarro C.
6-25-76-3
Bacsinszky T.
Babos T.
6-26-2
Wang Q.
Vesnina E.[11]
6-26-4
Barthel M.
Peng S.
6-13-66-3
Cornet A.
Errani S.
6-36-4
Ostapenko J.
Rogers S.
6-36-4
Jankovic J.
Riske Amritraj A.
6-36-3
Goerges J.
Mladenovic K.[13]
7-667-5
Williams V.[9]
Shvedova Y.
6-47-64
Tsurenko L.
Chiesa D.
7-56-2
Putintseva Y.
Puig M.
6-27-5
Siniakova K.
Zhang S.
5-76-37-66
Garcia C.
Vekic D.
7-623-67-66
Saville D.
Keys M.[10]
2-67-57-5
Bertens K.[15]
Niculescu M.
2-66-26-1
Bellis C.
Doi M.
6-47-66
Makarova K.
Vinci R.
6-26-1
Siegemund L.
Osaka N.
6-26-4
Sevastova A.
Begu I.
6-46-4
Pavlyuchenkova A.[12]
Stosur S.
6-46-756-1
Lucic M.[16]
Safarova L.
7-54-66-3
Sharapova M.
Mchale C.
6-46-2
Kontaveit A.
Petkovic A.
6-36-4
Strycova B.[14]
Kasatkina D.
4-64-3