Kimmer Coppejans vs Uladzimir Ignatik — Heilbronn CH Round of 32

Heilbronn CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL
Kimmer Coppejans
#199ATP
1544ELO
1513Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 May 2017
clay
BLR
Uladzimir Ignatik
#1413ATP
36 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
Coppejans K.
7-6 6-1
Ignatik U.
Coppejans K.
7762
Ignatik U.
6510

Kimmer Coppejans defeated Uladzimir Ignatik 7-6 6-1 in the Heilbronn CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Kimmer Coppejans came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Coppejans K.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ignatik U.

Ignatik U.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Serve advantage — Coppejans K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Coppejans K.Ignatik U.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
36%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.8
7.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Coppejans K.Ignatik U.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
44
0
Break points saved·Clear edge
67
53
Break points won·Clear edge
29
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
2
Tiebreaks·Dominant
43
6

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Coppejans K.Ignatik U.
Freshness·
76
—

Coppejans K.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 73 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Krajinovic F.
Gombos N.[4]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Krajinovic F.
Pella G.[6]
4-66-37-64
Gombos N.[4]
Giustino L.
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Pella G.[6]
Cecchinato M.
6-26-2
Gombos N.[4]
Ruud C.[8]
6-47-5
Giustino L.
Martin A.[7]
6-37-5
Krajinovic F.
Fucsovics M.
7-627-63
R16
Cecchinato M.
Krueger M.
6-36-2
Pella G.[6]
Djere L.
6-16-0
Ruud C.[8]
Basic M.
7-56-747-5
Gombos N.[4]
Diez S.
6-16-4
Giustino L.
Koepfer D.
7-641-66-1
Krajinovic F.
Kamke T.
6-11-0
Fucsovics M.
Coppejans K.
3-66-36-3
Martin A.[7]
Bublik A.
4-66-36-3
R32
Krueger M.
Donskoy E.[2]
6-04-66-4
Cecchinato M.
Shapovalov D.
6-36-4
Djere L.
Maden Y.
7-666-1
Pella G.[6]
Stebe C.
6-47-62
Fucsovics M.
Pavlasek A.[3]
6-27-5
Coppejans K.
Ignatik U.
7-656-1
Kamke T.
Kozlov S.
6-45-77-64
Krajinovic F.
Laaksonen H.[5]
6-26-1
Ruud C.[8]
Ilhan M.
6-24-66-1
Basic M.
Lestienne C.
6-26-1
Diez S.
Altmaier D.
6-46-4
Gombos N.[4]
Brands D.
4-67-656-3
Martin A.[7]
Groth S.
6-36-3
Bublik A.
Kovalik J.
7-606-4
Giustino L.
Novikov D.
6-46-4
Koepfer D.
Kicker N.[1]
6-23-66-1