Casper Ruud vs Mirza Basic — Heilbronn CH Round of 16

Heilbronn CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Casper Ruud
NOR8
Casper Ruud
#13ATP
1983ELO
1973Clay ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 May 2017
clay
Mirza Basic
BIH
Mirza Basic
#602ATP
35 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWW
Ruud C.
7-5 6-7 7-5
Basic M.
Ruud C.
76472
Basic M.
57751

Casper Ruud defeated Mirza Basic 7-5 6-7 7-5 in the Heilbronn CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Casper Ruud came in ranked #13.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ruud C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Basic M.

Basic M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ruud C.Basic M.
58
Serve
—
70
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ruud C.Basic M.
1st serve in·Even
65%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.7
3.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruud C.Basic M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
33
Break points saved·Dominant
99
56
Break points won·Dominant
75
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
66
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
67

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ruud C.Basic M.
Freshness·
100
—

Ruud C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Krajinovic F.
Gombos N.[4]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Krajinovic F.
Pella G.[6]
4-66-37-64
Gombos N.[4]
Giustino L.
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Pella G.[6]
Cecchinato M.
6-26-2
Gombos N.[4]
Ruud C.[8]
6-47-5
Giustino L.
Martin A.[7]
6-37-5
Krajinovic F.
Fucsovics M.
7-627-63
R16
Cecchinato M.
Krueger M.
6-36-2
Pella G.[6]
Djere L.
6-16-0
Ruud C.[8]
Basic M.
7-56-747-5
Gombos N.[4]
Diez S.
6-16-4
Giustino L.
Koepfer D.
7-641-66-1
Krajinovic F.
Kamke T.
6-11-0
Fucsovics M.
Coppejans K.
3-66-36-3
Martin A.[7]
Bublik A.
4-66-36-3
R32
Krueger M.
Donskoy E.[2]
6-04-66-4
Cecchinato M.
Shapovalov D.
6-36-4
Djere L.
Maden Y.
7-666-1
Pella G.[6]
Stebe C.
6-47-62
Fucsovics M.
Pavlasek A.[3]
6-27-5
Coppejans K.
Ignatik U.
7-656-1
Kamke T.
Kozlov S.
6-45-77-64
Krajinovic F.
Laaksonen H.[5]
6-26-1
Ruud C.[8]
Ilhan M.
6-24-66-1
Basic M.
Lestienne C.
6-26-1
Diez S.
Altmaier D.
6-46-4
Gombos N.[4]
Brands D.
4-67-656-3
Martin A.[7]
Groth S.
6-36-3
Bublik A.
Kovalik J.
7-606-4
Giustino L.
Novikov D.
6-46-4
Koepfer D.
Kicker N.[1]
6-23-66-1