Daniel Nguyen vs Raymond Sarmiento — Seoul CH Qualifying Round 2

Seoul CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
USA
Daniel Nguyen
35 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 May 2017
hard
USA
Raymond Sarmiento
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
Nguyen D.
3-6 7-6 6-2
Sarmiento R.
Nguyen D.
37762
Sarmiento R.
66221

Daniel Nguyen defeated Raymond Sarmiento 3-6 7-6 6-2 in the Seoul CH qualifying round 2 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Raymond Sarmiento came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, but Daniel Nguyen had been the form player, winning 5 of their last 10 on hard. Daniel Nguyen claimed a first win over Raymond Sarmiento in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-08-19Winston-SalemQ2hardRaymond Sarmiento6-2 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Nguyen D.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Sarmiento R.

Sarmiento R.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Nguyen D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nguyen D.Sarmiento R.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
45%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Even
55%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.9
4.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.1
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (68 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Q3
Nguyen D.
Ebden M.[4]
6-26-0
Auger Aliassime F.
Saville L.[7]
5-76-26-2
Sekiguchi S.[8]
Glasspool L.
6-36-3
Krajicek A.[6]
Miedler L.
7-646-3
Q2
Nguyen D.
Sarmiento R.
3-67-626-2
Ebden M.[4]
Hurkacz H.
6-06-3
Saville L.[7]
Oh C.
6-26-4
Auger Aliassime F.
Purcell M.[3]
7-656-4
Sekiguchi S.[8]
Ochi M.
6-16-1
Glasspool L.
Paz J.[2]
6-36-2
Krajicek A.[6]
Corrie E.
6-26-4
Miedler L.
Mousley B.
6-46-2
Q1
Sarmiento R.
Takahashi Y.
6-36-2
Nguyen D.
Niki T.[5]
2-66-16-2
Hurkacz H.
Ly N.
6-16-766-3
Ebden M.[4]
Clarke J.
7-626-2
Saville L.[7]
Son J.
6-36-4
Oh C.
Cho H.
6-16-2
Auger Aliassime F.
Nielsen F.
6-16-4
Purcell M.[3]
Kang H.
6-16-0
Sekiguchi S.[8]
Kim Y.
6-16-4
Ochi M.
Kim C.
2-66-36-1
Glasspool L.
Rawat S.
6-756-47-62
Paz J.[2]
Shin E.
6-36-2
Krajicek A.[6]
Jung K.
6-16-2
Miedler L.
De Waard S.
6-13-66-3
Mousley B.
Withrow J.
7-646-4