Kiki Bertens vs Timea Bacsinszky — Madrid Round of 32
Madrid · WTA · Round of 32
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 May 2017
clay
Bertens K.6-2 6-2
Bacsinszky T.
Bertens K.
662
Bacsinszky T.
220
Kiki Bertens defeated Timea Bacsinszky 6-2 6-2 in the Madrid round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Timea Bacsinszky came in defending last year's round of 16. Kiki Bertens extended the head-to-head to 3–2.
Key context
- Match story: Kiki Bertens dropped just 4 games past Timea Bacsinszky.
Head to head
2–2| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-03-06 | Indian Wells | R32 | hard | Timea Bacsinszky | 6-3 5-7 7-6(8) |
| 2016-07-11 | Gstaad | SF | clay | Kiki Bertens | 7-5 7-6(1) |
| 2016-05-23 | Roland Garros | QF | clay | Kiki Bertens | 7-5 6-2 |
| 2014-08-25 | US Open | R128 | hard | Timea Bacsinszky | 6-7(7) 4-3 RET |
Serve vs return
This seasonBaseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
46%
Service points won·Even
60%
56%
Return points won·Even
45%
45%
Break points saved·Even
56%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.9
1.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.2
2.3
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 70). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
63
35
Break points saved·Dominant
71
46
Break points won·Clear edge
89
76
Deciding sets·Slight edge
74
66
Tiebreaks·Dominant
53
17
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
23°CPartly cloudy
Wind 6 km/hHumidity 32%
Draw
Quarter-finals
Sevastova A.
Bertens K.
6-36-3
Halep S.[3]
Vandeweghe C.
6-16-1
Mladenovic K.[14]
Cirstea S.
6-46-4
Kuznetsova S.[8]
Bouchard E.
6-46-0
R16
Sevastova A.
Arruabarrena L.
7-56-2
Halep S.[3]
Stosur S.[16]
6-44-66-4
Vandeweghe C.
Suarez Navarro C.
5-76-47-5
Cirstea S.
Doi M.
7-53-66-1
Mladenovic K.[14]
Dodin O.
6-26-1
Kuznetsova S.[8]
Wang Q.
6-47-5
Bouchard E.
Kerber A.[1]
6-35-0
Bertens K.
Begu I.
6-17-5
R32
Sevastova A.
Pliskova K.[2]
6-36-3
Arruabarrena L.
Strycova B.[15]
3-66-36-3
Begu I.
Larsson J.
4-67-656-3
Bertens K.
Bacsinszky T.
6-26-2
Halep S.[3]
Vinci R.
6-32-67-62
Stosur S.[16]
Duque Marino M.
6-37-5
Suarez Navarro C.
Wozniacki C.[10]
6-42-66-2
Vandeweghe C.
Siegemund L.
6-24-66-3
Doi M.
Vekic D.
6-16-2
Cirstea S.
Bellis C.
6-36-2
Mladenovic K.[14]
Davis L.
6-31-67-61
Dodin O.
Cibulkova D.[4]
6-26-4
Kuznetsova S.[8]
Riske Amritraj A.
2-67-696-2
Wang Q.
Zheng S.
6-23-66-2
Bouchard E.
Sharapova M.
7-52-66-4
Kerber A.[1]
Siniakova K.
6-21-67-5
R64
Pliskova K.[2]
Tsurenko L.
7-652-66-2
Sevastova A.
Zhang S.
6-26-4
Arruabarrena L.
Mchale C.
4-67-616-2
Strycova B.[15]
Safarova L.
5-76-36-3
Begu I.
Vesnina E.[12]
6-46-4
Larsson J.
Schiavone F.
5-76-36-1
Bertens K.
Makarova K.
6-17-64
Bacsinszky T.
Muguruza G.[5]
6-16-3
Halep S.[3]
Pliskova K.
6-16-2
Vinci R.
Kasatkina D.
6-11-66-1
Duque Marino M.
Goerges J.
6-36-4
Stosur S.[16]
Sorribes Tormo S.
6-26-0
Wozniacki C.[10]
Niculescu M.
7-56-736-4
Suarez Navarro C.
Peng S.
3-67-56-0
Vandeweghe C.
Kontaveit A.
6-47-67
Siegemund L.
Konta J.[6]
3-67-56-4
Doi M.
Keys M.[9]
6-44-66-4
Vekic D.
Putintseva Y.
6-36-4
Bellis C.
Saville D.
7-55-76-2
Cirstea S.
Pavlyuchenkova A.[13]
6-13-67-65
Davis L.
Puig M.
6-34-67-63
Dodin O.
Petkovic A.
6-36-4
Cibulkova D.[4]
Jankovic J.
6-45-77-5
Kuznetsova S.[8]
Shvedova Y.
6-46-3
Riske Amritraj A.
Golubic V.
6-26-4
Wang Q.
Garcia C.
6-46-3
Zheng S.
Svitolina E.[11]
2-67-646-3
Sharapova M.
Lucic M.[17]
4-66-46-0
Bouchard E.
Cornet A.
6-44-66-1
Siniakova K.
Parmentier P.
6-16-0
Kerber A.[1]
Babos T.
6-46-2
Mladenovic K.[14]
Konjuh A.
5-76-30-0