Quentin Halys vs Jordan Thompson — Anning CH Quarter-final

Anning CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Quentin Halys
FRA6
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1664Clay ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 April 2017
clay
Jordan Thompson
AUS1
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1605Clay ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
Halys Q.
6-3 6-4
Thompson J.
Halys Q.
662
Thompson J.
340

Quentin Halys defeated Jordan Thompson 6-3 6-4 in the Anning CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Quentin Halys came in ranked #90. Quentin Halys extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Quentin Halys closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-01-02Adelaide 1R32hardQuentin Halys6-3 6-4
2022-06-20MallorcaQ2grassJordan Thompson6-2 6-0

Serve vs return

This season
Halys Q.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Thompson J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Halys Q.Thompson J.
1st serve in·Even
58%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
54%
Service points won·Even
67%
66%
Return points won·Even
34%
37%
Break points saved·Even
65%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.1
7.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
1.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Halys Q.Thompson J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
57
70
Break points saved·Even
97
97
Break points won·Clear edge
4
24
Deciding sets·Clear edge
75
91
Tiebreaks·Even
91
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Halys Q.Thompson J.
Freshness·
93
—

Halys Q.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Tipsarevic J.[2]
Halys Q.[6]
6-756-36-4
Semi-finals
Tipsarevic J.[2]
Paz J.
6-46-3
Halys Q.[6]
Otte O.
6-34-66-3
Quarter-finals
Tipsarevic J.[2]
Kavcic B.[5]
6-16-4
Paz J.
Wu D.
2-67-56-4
Halys Q.[6]
Thompson J.[1]
6-36-4
Otte O.
Martin A.[4]
6-756-26-2
R16
Tipsarevic J.[2]
Jung J.
7-56-2
Kavcic B.[5]
Tepavac M.
7-666-4
Wu D.
Whittington A.
2-66-46-2
Paz J.
Gabashvili T.[8]
6-47-5
Otte O.
Quinzi G.
6-26-3
Martin A.[4]
Majchrzak K.
6-36-2
Thompson J.[1]
Fabbiano T.
6-36-4
Halys Q.[6]
Bai Y.
6-26-1
R32
Tipsarevic J.[2]
Sun F.
6-06-4
Jung J.
Xia Z.
7-57-5
Tepavac M.
Auger Aliassime F.
2-66-46-4
Gabashvili T.[8]
Milojevic N.
6-15-77-61
Otte O.
Gunneswaran P.
4-66-36-4
Majchrzak K.
Zhang Z.
7-56-1
Martin A.[4]
Kudryavtsev A.
6-13-66-1
Halys Q.[6]
Santillan A.
7-654-67-5
Bai Y.
Munoz de la Nava D.
6-46-4
Fabbiano T.
Nedovyesov A.
2-66-26-2
Thompson J.[1]
Ivashka I.
5-76-37-65
Kavcic B.[5]
He Y.
6-27-5
Quinzi G.
Bourgue M.[7]
3-0
Wu D.
Vanni L.[3]
6-26-2
Whittington A.
Coppejans K.
6-32-67-5
Paz J.
Chiudinelli M.
6-26-1