Jordan Thompson vs Thomas Fabbiano — Anning CH Round of 16

Anning CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Jordan Thompson
AUS1
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1605Clay ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 April 2017
clay
ITA
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
Thompson J.
6-3 6-4
Fabbiano T.
Thompson J.
662
Fabbiano T.
340

Jordan Thompson defeated Thomas Fabbiano 6-3 6-4 in the Anning CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Thomas Fabbiano came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Jordan Thompson claimed a first win over Thomas Fabbiano in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-08-28US OpenR64hardThomas Fabbiano2-6 6-2 3-6 6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Fabbiano T.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Serve advantage — Thompson J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Fabbiano T.
1st serve in·Even
60%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.2
2.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.3
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Fabbiano T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
70
28
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
81
Break points won·Slight edge
24
16
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Tipsarevic J.[2]
Halys Q.[6]
6-756-36-4
Semi-finals
Tipsarevic J.[2]
Paz J.
6-46-3
Halys Q.[6]
Otte O.
6-34-66-3
Quarter-finals
Tipsarevic J.[2]
Kavcic B.[5]
6-16-4
Paz J.
Wu D.
2-67-56-4
Halys Q.[6]
Thompson J.[1]
6-36-4
Otte O.
Martin A.[4]
6-756-26-2
R16
Tipsarevic J.[2]
Jung J.
7-56-2
Kavcic B.[5]
Tepavac M.
7-666-4
Wu D.
Whittington A.
2-66-46-2
Paz J.
Gabashvili T.[8]
6-47-5
Otte O.
Quinzi G.
6-26-3
Martin A.[4]
Majchrzak K.
6-36-2
Thompson J.[1]
Fabbiano T.
6-36-4
Halys Q.[6]
Bai Y.
6-26-1
R32
Tipsarevic J.[2]
Sun F.
6-06-4
Jung J.
Xia Z.
7-57-5
Tepavac M.
Auger Aliassime F.
2-66-46-4
Gabashvili T.[8]
Milojevic N.
6-15-77-61
Otte O.
Gunneswaran P.
4-66-36-4
Majchrzak K.
Zhang Z.
7-56-1
Martin A.[4]
Kudryavtsev A.
6-13-66-1
Halys Q.[6]
Santillan A.
7-654-67-5
Bai Y.
Munoz de la Nava D.
6-46-4
Fabbiano T.
Nedovyesov A.
2-66-26-2
Thompson J.[1]
Ivashka I.
5-76-37-65
Kavcic B.[5]
He Y.
6-27-5
Quinzi G.
Bourgue M.[7]
3-0
Wu D.
Vanni L.[3]
6-26-2
Whittington A.
Coppejans K.
6-32-67-5
Paz J.
Chiudinelli M.
6-26-1