Lukas Lacko vs Jason Jung — Taipei CH Round of 32

Taipei CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SVK5
Lukas Lacko
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 April 2017
hard
Jason Jung
TPE
Jason Jung
#896ATP
1420ELO
1389Hard ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLL
Lacko L.
6-1 6-4
Jung J.
Lacko L.
662
Jung J.
140

Lukas Lacko defeated Jason Jung 6-1 6-4 in the Taipei CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jason Jung came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 16, but Lukas Lacko had been the form player, winning 1 of their last 5 on hard. Lukas Lacko claimed a first win over Jason Jung in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-07-26AtlantaQ1hardJason Jung6-4 6-7(4) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Lacko L.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Jung J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Lacko L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lacko L.Jung J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.4
2.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lacko L.Jung J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
26
21
Break points saved·Clear edge
86
64
Break points won·Even
8
8
Deciding sets·Clear edge
33
21
Tiebreaks·Dominant
27
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Lacko L.Jung J.
Freshness·
—
78

Jung J.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Lu Y.[2]
Ito T.
6-17-64
Semi-finals
Lu Y.[2]
Pospisil V.[6]
6-46-4
Ito T.
Santillan A.
6-42-67-5
Quarter-finals
Santillan A.
Ebden M.
6-41-66-0
Lu Y.[2]
Soeda G.[8]
6-16-3
Pospisil V.[6]
Chiudinelli M.
6-36-4
Ito T.
Kravchuk K.[3]
6-47-65
R16
Lu Y.[2]
Wang J.
7-56-1
Soeda G.[8]
Bachinger M.
4-66-46-1
Chiudinelli M.
Sela D.[4]
6-46-3
Pospisil V.[6]
Gunneswaran P.
7-646-2
Ito T.
Lacko L.[5]
6-46-4
Kravchuk K.[3]
Skugor F.
7-657-5
Santillan A.
Ramanathan R.
6-43-67-64
Ebden M.
Kwon S.
6-737-56-2
R32
Bachinger M.
Klein B.
6-46-2
Sela D.[4]
Yang T.
6-46-2
Chiudinelli M.
Saville L.
6-46-4
Gunneswaran P.
Roelofse R.
7-646-4
Pospisil V.[6]
Mukund S.
7-56-2
Lacko L.[5]
Jung J.
6-16-4
Skugor F.
Sekiguchi S.
6-16-4
Kravchuk K.[3]
Jaloviec M.
6-36-3
Ramanathan R.
Lee D.[7]
2-66-26-4
Santillan A.
Matosevic M.
6-13-67-65
Ebden M.
Chen T.
6-27-5
Kwon S.
Baghdatis M.[1]
6-37-5
Wang J.
Kudryavtsev A.
4-66-40-0
Soeda G.[8]
Moriya H.
7-627-65
Ito T.
Uchiyama Y.
6-43-0
Lu Y.[2]
Lee K.
6-26-1