Tatsuma Ito vs Akira Santillan — Taipei CH Semi-final

Taipei CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
JPN
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 April 2017
hard
Akira Santillan
AUS
Akira Santillan
#301ATP
1367ELO
1343Hard ELO
29 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWLLLLWL
Ito T.
6-4 2-6 7-5
Santillan A.
Ito T.
6272
Santillan A.
4651

Tatsuma Ito defeated Akira Santillan 6-4 2-6 7-5 in the Taipei CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Tatsuma Ito came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Tatsuma Ito closed it out in three sets, 6–4 2–6 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ito T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Santillan A.

Santillan A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ito T.Santillan A.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.8
5.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ito T.Santillan A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
24
0
Break points saved·Dominant
61
32
Break points won·Slight edge
9
16
Deciding sets·Dominant
43
17
Tiebreaks·Dominant
48
11

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ito T.Santillan A.
Freshness·
—
80

Santillan A.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 24 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Lu Y.[2]
Ito T.
6-17-64
Semi-finals
Lu Y.[2]
Pospisil V.[6]
6-46-4
Ito T.
Santillan A.
6-42-67-5
Quarter-finals
Santillan A.
Ebden M.
6-41-66-0
Lu Y.[2]
Soeda G.[8]
6-16-3
Pospisil V.[6]
Chiudinelli M.
6-36-4
Ito T.
Kravchuk K.[3]
6-47-65
R16
Lu Y.[2]
Wang J.
7-56-1
Soeda G.[8]
Bachinger M.
4-66-46-1
Chiudinelli M.
Sela D.[4]
6-46-3
Pospisil V.[6]
Gunneswaran P.
7-646-2
Ito T.
Lacko L.[5]
6-46-4
Kravchuk K.[3]
Skugor F.
7-657-5
Santillan A.
Ramanathan R.
6-43-67-64
Ebden M.
Kwon S.
6-737-56-2
R32
Bachinger M.
Klein B.
6-46-2
Sela D.[4]
Yang T.
6-46-2
Chiudinelli M.
Saville L.
6-46-4
Gunneswaran P.
Roelofse R.
7-646-4
Pospisil V.[6]
Mukund S.
7-56-2
Lacko L.[5]
Jung J.
6-16-4
Skugor F.
Sekiguchi S.
6-16-4
Kravchuk K.[3]
Jaloviec M.
6-36-3
Ramanathan R.
Lee D.[7]
2-66-26-4
Santillan A.
Matosevic M.
6-13-67-65
Ebden M.
Chen T.
6-27-5
Kwon S.
Baghdatis M.[1]
6-37-5
Wang J.
Kudryavtsev A.
4-66-40-0
Soeda G.[8]
Moriya H.
7-627-65
Ito T.
Uchiyama Y.
6-43-0
Lu Y.[2]
Lee K.
6-26-1