Miomir Kecmanovic vs Stefan Kozlov — San Luis Potosi CH Round of 32

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Miomir Kecmanovic
SRB
Miomir Kecmanovic
#59ATP
1768ELO
1733Clay ELO
$756kYTD
$9.0MCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 April 2017
clay
Stefan Kozlov
USA3
Stefan Kozlov
#296ATP
1429ELO
1397Clay ELO
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWLW
Kecmanovic M.
6-2 7-5
Kozlov S.
Kecmanovic M.
672
Kozlov S.
250

Miomir Kecmanovic defeated Stefan Kozlov 6-2 7-5 in the San Luis Potosi CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Miomir Kecmanovic came in ranked #59.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kecmanovic M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Kozlov S.

Kozlov S.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Kecmanovic M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kecmanovic M.Kozlov S.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
42%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.6
2.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kecmanovic M.Kozlov S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
68
36
Break points saved·Dominant
98
49
Break points won·Dominant
67
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
60
85
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kecmanovic M.Kozlov S.
Freshness·Clear edge
82
69

Kecmanovic M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d) · Kozlov S.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 72 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Martin A.[5]
Menendez Maceiras A.[8]
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Menendez Maceiras A.[8]
Kecmanovic M.
6-36-4
Martin A.[5]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Kecmanovic M.
Arevalo M.[7]
6-46-3
Arnaboldi A.
Quiroz R.
7-626-4
Martin A.[5]
Bagnis F.[1]
2-67-627-66
Menendez Maceiras A.[8]
Melzer G.[2]
2-66-46-4
R16
Melzer G.[2]
Zampieri C.
6-36-4
Menendez Maceiras A.[8]
King E.
6-16-2
Kecmanovic M.
Gomez E.
6-14-66-3
Arevalo M.[7]
Coria F.
6-16-4
Arnaboldi A.
Sanchez M.
6-26-4
Quiroz R.
Souza J.[4]
6-46-2
Martin A.[5]
Velotti A.
6-26-1
Bagnis F.[1]
Londero J.
6-34-66-3
R32
Melzer G.[2]
Arguello F.
6-26-2
Zampieri C.
Krstin P.
6-27-61
Menendez Maceiras A.[8]
Sorgi J.
6-27-67
Kecmanovic M.
Kozlov S.[3]
6-27-5
Gomez E.
Galan D.
6-46-4
Coria F.
Hank T.
6-36-2
Arevalo M.[7]
De La Pena C.
6-36-3
Arnaboldi A.
Ghem A.
6-25-76-1
Quiroz R.
Cid R.
6-16-2
Souza J.[4]
Margaroli L.
6-17-62
Martin A.[5]
Endara I.
6-43-66-1
Velotti A.
Lipovsek Puches T.
6-36-0
Londero J.
Felder M.
6-36-3
Bagnis F.[1]
Zekic M.
7-666-4
King E.
El Mihdawy A.
5-1
Sanchez M.
Safwat M.[6]
4-67-656-4