Facundo Bagnis vs Juan Ignacio Londero — San Luis Potosi CH Round of 16

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ARG1
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 April 2017
clay
ARG
Juan Ignacio Londero
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWWL
Bagnis F.
6-3 4-6 6-3
Londero J.
Bagnis F.
6462
Londero J.
3631

Facundo Bagnis defeated Juan Ignacio Londero 6-3 4-6 6-3 in the San Luis Potosi CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Facundo Bagnis came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Facundo Bagnis extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Facundo Bagnis closed it out in three sets, 6–3 4–6 6–3.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-08-27US OpenQ1hardFacundo Bagnis7-5 7-6(7)

Serve vs return

This season
Bagnis F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Londero J.

Londero J.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Serve advantage — Bagnis F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bagnis F.Londero J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
3.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bagnis F.Londero J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
54
27
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
82
Break points won·Slight edge
35
30
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
23
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
3
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Martin A.[5]
Menendez Maceiras A.[8]
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Menendez Maceiras A.[8]
Kecmanovic M.
6-36-4
Martin A.[5]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Kecmanovic M.
Arevalo M.[7]
6-46-3
Arnaboldi A.
Quiroz R.
7-626-4
Martin A.[5]
Bagnis F.[1]
2-67-627-66
Menendez Maceiras A.[8]
Melzer G.[2]
2-66-46-4
R16
Melzer G.[2]
Zampieri C.
6-36-4
Menendez Maceiras A.[8]
King E.
6-16-2
Kecmanovic M.
Gomez E.
6-14-66-3
Arevalo M.[7]
Coria F.
6-16-4
Arnaboldi A.
Sanchez M.
6-26-4
Quiroz R.
Souza J.[4]
6-46-2
Martin A.[5]
Velotti A.
6-26-1
Bagnis F.[1]
Londero J.
6-34-66-3
R32
Melzer G.[2]
Arguello F.
6-26-2
Zampieri C.
Krstin P.
6-27-61
Menendez Maceiras A.[8]
Sorgi J.
6-27-67
Kecmanovic M.
Kozlov S.[3]
6-27-5
Gomez E.
Galan D.
6-46-4
Coria F.
Hank T.
6-36-2
Arevalo M.[7]
De La Pena C.
6-36-3
Arnaboldi A.
Ghem A.
6-25-76-1
Quiroz R.
Cid R.
6-16-2
Souza J.[4]
Margaroli L.
6-17-62
Martin A.[5]
Endara I.
6-43-66-1
Velotti A.
Lipovsek Puches T.
6-36-0
Londero J.
Felder M.
6-36-3
Bagnis F.[1]
Zekic M.
7-666-4
King E.
El Mihdawy A.
5-1
Sanchez M.
Safwat M.[6]
4-67-656-4