Miomir Kecmanovic vs Marcelo Arevalo — San Luis Potosi CH Quarter-final

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Miomir Kecmanovic
SRB
Miomir Kecmanovic
#59ATP
1768ELO
1733Clay ELO
$756kYTD
$9.0MCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 April 2017
clay
ESA7
Marcelo Arevalo
35 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Kecmanovic M.
6-4 6-3
Arevalo M.
Kecmanovic M.
662
Arevalo M.
430

Miomir Kecmanovic defeated Marcelo Arevalo 6-4 6-3 in the San Luis Potosi CH quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Marcelo Arevalo came in defending last year's final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kecmanovic M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Arevalo M.

Arevalo M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Kecmanovic M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kecmanovic M.Arevalo M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.6
5.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 146). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kecmanovic M.Arevalo M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
68
10
Break points saved·Dominant
98
68
Break points won·Dominant
67
15
Deciding sets·Dominant
60
9
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
14

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kecmanovic M.Arevalo M.
Freshness·
82
—

Kecmanovic M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Martin A.[5]
Menendez Maceiras A.[8]
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Menendez Maceiras A.[8]
Kecmanovic M.
6-36-4
Martin A.[5]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Kecmanovic M.
Arevalo M.[7]
6-46-3
Arnaboldi A.
Quiroz R.
7-626-4
Martin A.[5]
Bagnis F.[1]
2-67-627-66
Menendez Maceiras A.[8]
Melzer G.[2]
2-66-46-4
R16
Melzer G.[2]
Zampieri C.
6-36-4
Menendez Maceiras A.[8]
King E.
6-16-2
Kecmanovic M.
Gomez E.
6-14-66-3
Arevalo M.[7]
Coria F.
6-16-4
Arnaboldi A.
Sanchez M.
6-26-4
Quiroz R.
Souza J.[4]
6-46-2
Martin A.[5]
Velotti A.
6-26-1
Bagnis F.[1]
Londero J.
6-34-66-3
R32
Melzer G.[2]
Arguello F.
6-26-2
Zampieri C.
Krstin P.
6-27-61
Menendez Maceiras A.[8]
Sorgi J.
6-27-67
Kecmanovic M.
Kozlov S.[3]
6-27-5
Gomez E.
Galan D.
6-46-4
Coria F.
Hank T.
6-36-2
Arevalo M.[7]
De La Pena C.
6-36-3
Arnaboldi A.
Ghem A.
6-25-76-1
Quiroz R.
Cid R.
6-16-2
Souza J.[4]
Margaroli L.
6-17-62
Martin A.[5]
Endara I.
6-43-66-1
Velotti A.
Lipovsek Puches T.
6-36-0
Londero J.
Felder M.
6-36-3
Bagnis F.[1]
Zekic M.
7-666-4
King E.
El Mihdawy A.
5-1
Sanchez M.
Safwat M.[6]
4-67-656-4