Guillermo Garcia Lopez vs Lukas Rosol — Sophia Antipolis CH Round of 16

Sophia Antipolis CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ESP3
Guillermo Garcia Lopez
43 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 April 2017
clay
CZE
Lukas Rosol
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLL
Garcia Lopez G.
6-0 5-7 6-3
Rosol L.
Garcia Lopez G.
6562
Rosol L.
0731

Guillermo Garcia Lopez defeated Lukas Rosol 6-0 5-7 6-3 in the Sophia Antipolis CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Lukas Rosol came in leading the head-to-head 4–2. Guillermo Garcia Lopez narrowed the head-to-head to 4–3.

Key context

Head to head

2–4
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-07-01WimbledonQ2grassLukas Rosol7-5 3-6 8-6
2016-01-11AucklandR32hardLukas Rosol7-6(5) 6-4
2015-11-02Paris MastersR64hardLukas Rosol6-2 2-6 6-3
2015-09-28ShenzhenR16hardGuillermo Garcia Lopez6-4 6-3
2015-04-20BucharestQFclayGuillermo Garcia Lopez6-4 7-6(7)
2013-04-22BucharestFclayLukas Rosol6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Garcia Lopez G.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Rosol L.

Rosol L.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Garcia Lopez G.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Garcia Lopez G.Rosol L.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.3
4.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.7
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Garcia Lopez G.Rosol L.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
57
51
Break points saved·Even
88
89
Break points won·Dominant
29
3
Deciding sets·Even
76
78
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
63
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Bedene A.[4]
Paire B.[1]
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Bedene A.[4]
Cecchinato M.
6-26-2
Paire B.[1]
Kovalik J.
6-47-66
Quarter-finals
Cecchinato M.
De Greef A.[8]
6-36-3
Bedene A.[4]
Bourgue M.
6-47-65
Kovalik J.
Garcia Lopez G.[3]
7-655-76-1
Paire B.[1]
Fucsovics M.
7-56-3
R16
Cecchinato M.
Ignatik U.
6-36-4
Bedene A.[4]
Krajinovic F.
6-47-63
Bourgue M.
Gombos N.[7]
6-36-4
Kovalik J.
Lee D.
5-76-46-4
Garcia Lopez G.[3]
Rosol L.
6-05-76-3
Fucsovics M.
Mathieu P.[5]
6-41-66-3
Paire B.[1]
Coppejans K.
6-16-7106-4
De Greef A.[8]
Napolitano S.
6-45-77-64
R32
Lee D.
Lestienne C.
5-77-54-2
Cecchinato M.
Almagro N.[2]
6-22-66-3
Ignatik U.
Oliel Y.
6-46-4
Napolitano S.
Montanes A.
6-26-1
De Greef A.[8]
Millot V.
6-26-4
Bedene A.[4]
Lopez Perez E.
6-36-4
Krajinovic F.
Gaio F.
6-36-4
Bourgue M.
Carballes Baena R.
4-66-16-4
Gombos N.[7]
Skugor F.
4-66-46-1
Kovalik J.
Copil M.[6]
4-66-26-2
Garcia Lopez G.[3]
Moutet C.
6-27-5
Mathieu P.[5]
Djere L.
6-46-3
Fucsovics M.
De Schepper K.
6-16-2
Coppejans K.
Tsitsipas S.
6-26-4
Paire B.[1]
Trungelliti M.
6-16-4
Rosol L.
Janvier M.
6-716-36-4