Uladzimir Ignatik vs Jaume Munar — Quanzhou CH Round of 32

Quanzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BLR7
Uladzimir Ignatik
#1413ATP
36 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 20 March 2017
hard
Jaume Munar
ESP
Jaume Munar
#44ATP
1766ELO
1743Hard ELO
$549kYTD
$7.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Ignatik U.
6-4 3-6 6-3
Munar J.
Ignatik U.
6362
Munar J.
4631

Uladzimir Ignatik defeated Jaume Munar 6-4 3-6 6-3 in the Quanzhou CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jaume Munar came in ranked #44.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ignatik U.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Munar J.

Munar J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Ignatik U.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Ignatik U.Munar J.
—
Serve
42
—
Return
60

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ignatik U.Munar J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.1
3.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ignatik U.Munar J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
50
Break points saved·Dominant
53
95
Break points won·Dominant
6
66
Deciding sets·Dominant
2
30
Tiebreaks·Dominant
6
45

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ignatik U.Munar J.
Freshness·
—
78

Munar J.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Fabbiano T.[6]
Berrettini M.
7-657-67
Semi-finals
Berrettini M.
Marterer M.[5]
6-43-66-3
Fabbiano T.[6]
Ivashka I.
4-0
Quarter-finals
Marterer M.[5]
Bhambri Y.
6-36-2
Fabbiano T.[6]
Diez S.
6-06-2
Ivashka I.
Ignatik U.[7]
7-696-2
Berrettini M.
Lee D.[2]
6-46-766-1
R16
Lee D.[2]
Wu D.
7-646-766-2
Berrettini M.
Sousa P.
6-46-726-2
Bhambri Y.
Kavcic B.[4]
2-66-36-4
Marterer M.[5]
Oconnell C.
6-46-2
Fabbiano T.[6]
Nedovyesov A.
7-54-67-5
Diez S.
Karatsev A.
6-11-66-2
Ignatik U.[7]
Sekiguchi S.
7-6116-4
Ivashka I.
Hurkacz H.
6-44-67-5
R32
Fabbiano T.[6]
Sonego L.
6-26-4
Ignatik U.[7]
Munar J.
6-43-66-3
Wu D.
Napolitano S.
6-16-4
Sousa P.
Bai Y.
6-46-2
Kavcic B.[4]
Uchiyama Y.
6-37-5
Bhambri Y.
Ito T.
7-626-2
Oconnell C.
Pellegrino A.
6-16-3
Nedovyesov A.
Xia Z.
6-16-2
Diez S.
Zhang Z.
6-46-2
Karatsev A.
Vanni L.[3]
6-46-3
Sekiguchi S.
Velotti A.
7-656-4
Hurkacz H.
Milojevic N.
4-67-56-4
Ivashka I.
Sugita Y.[1]
5-76-16-4
Berrettini M.
Lopez Perez E.[8]
7-627-65
Marterer M.[5]
Matosevic M.
6-33-0
Lee D.[2]
Te R.
6-47-65