Madison Brengle vs Jelena Ostapenko — Miami Round of 128

Miami · WTA · Round of 128
Madison Brengle
USA
Madison Brengle
#210WTA
1575ELO
1539Hard ELO
36 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 20 March 2017
hard
Jelena Ostapenko
LAT
Jelena Ostapenko
#29WTA
1855ELO
1794Hard ELO
$1.2MYTD
$20MCAREER
29 yrs · 177 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWL
Brengle M.
6-3 3-6 6-2
Ostapenko J.
Brengle M.
6362
Ostapenko J.
3621

Madison Brengle defeated Jelena Ostapenko 6-3 3-6 6-2 in the Miami round of 128 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jelena Ostapenko came in ranked #29, leading the head-to-head 3–0. Madison Brengle claimed a first win over Jelena Ostapenko in four meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 3–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Madison Brengle closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 6–2.

Head to head

0–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-09-28Roland GarrosR128clayJelena Ostapenko6-2 6-1
2017-02-27AcapulcoR16hardJelena Ostapenko7-5 6-4
2017-01-02AucklandQFhardJelena Ostapenko7-5 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Brengle M.serving60% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Ostapenko J.

Ostapenko J.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Brengle M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Brengle M.Ostapenko J.
—
Serve
10
—
Return
45

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Brengle M.Ostapenko J.
1st serve in·Clear edge
76%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
56%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
44%
Service points won·Even
53%
57%
Return points won·Even
48%
45%
Break points saved·Even
50%
53%
Aces / match·Dominant
0.2
3.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.7
5.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Brengle M.Ostapenko J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
7
88
Break points saved·Dominant
7
79
Break points won·Even
98
100
Deciding sets·Dominant
8
96
Tiebreaks·Dominant
46
87

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Brengle M.Ostapenko J.
Freshness·Clear edge
79
93

Brengle M.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 55 games (7d) · Ostapenko J.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
23°CMainly clear
Wind 15 km/hHumidity 44%

Draw

Final
Konta J.[10]
Wozniacki C.[12]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Wozniacki C.[12]
Pliskova K.[2]
5-76-16-1
Konta J.[10]
Williams V.[11]
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Pliskova K.[2]
Lucic M.[26]
6-36-4
Wozniacki C.[12]
Safarova L.
6-46-3
Konta J.[10]
Halep S.[3]
3-67-676-2
Williams V.[11]
Kerber A.[1]
7-56-3
R16
Wozniacki C.[12]
Muguruza G.[6]
7-610-0
Pliskova K.[2]
Strycova B.[15]
6-16-4
Lucic M.[26]
Mattek Sands B.
7-56-4
Halep S.[3]
Stosur S.[14]
4-67-56-2
Kerber A.[1]
Ozaki R.
6-26-2
Safarova L.
Cibulkova D.[4]
7-656-1
Konta J.[10]
Arruabarrena L.
7-56-1
Williams V.[11]
Kuznetsova S.[7]
6-37-64
R32
Pliskova K.[2]
Putintseva Y.[27]
7-56-3
Strycova B.[15]
Cepelova J.
6-26-4
Mattek Sands B.
Pavlyuchenkova A.[17]
4-66-06-3
Lucic M.[26]
Radwanska A.[5]
6-06-3
Cibulkova D.[4]
Flipkens K.
6-26-3
Safarova L.
Tomljanovic A.
6-16-3
Wozniacki C.[12]
Cirstea S.
6-46-2
Muguruza G.[6]
Zhang S.[30]
4-66-26-2
Arruabarrena L.
Keys M.[8]
7-57-5
Konta J.[10]
Parmentier P.
6-46-0
Stosur S.[14]
Peng S.
4-66-37-5
Halep S.[3]
Kontaveit A.
6-36-0
Ozaki R.
Goerges J.
7-656-3
Kerber A.[1]
Rogers S.
6-47-5
Williams V.[11]
Tig P.
6-36-0
Kuznetsova S.[7]
Townsend T.
6-46-2
R64
Radwanska A.[5]
Wang Q.
7-636-1
Pliskova K.[2]
Brengle M.
6-16-3
Putintseva Y.[27]
Witthoeft C.
6-46-4
Cepelova J.
Vandeweghe C.[18]
6-23-66-1
Strycova B.[15]
Larsson J.
4-66-37-63
Mattek Sands B.
Svitolina E.[9]
7-56-4
Pavlyuchenkova A.[17]
Shvedova Y.
6-736-26-0
Lucic M.[26]
Bondarenko K.
6-22-67-62
Cibulkova D.[4]
Cepede Royg V.
6-36-2
Flipkens K.
Konjuh A.[29]
7-646-766-2
Safarova L.
Saville D.[23]
6-26-2
Tomljanovic A.
Vesnina E.[13]
3-66-47-5
Wozniacki C.[12]
Lepchenko V.
6-16-2
Cirstea S.
Sevastova A.[19]
7-643-66-3
Zhang S.[30]
Errani S.
4-66-47-5
Muguruza G.[6]
Mchale C.
0-67-666-4
Keys M.[8]
Golubic V.
6-16-2
Arruabarrena L.
Begu I.[28]
3-66-46-3
Parmentier P.
Babos T.[24]
6-716-26-0
Konta J.[10]
Sasnovich A.
6-26-756-4
Stosur S.[14]
Barty A.
6-46-4
Peng S.
Garcia C.[21]
6-46-0
Kontaveit A.
Makarova K.[32]
6-716-26-2
Halep S.[3]
Osaka N.
6-42-66-3
Kuznetsova S.[7]
Minella M.
6-26-2
Townsend T.
Vinci R.[25]
6-36-2
Tig P.
Mladenovic K.[22]
7-646-2
Williams V.[11]
Haddad Maia B.
6-46-3
Ozaki R.
Bertens K.[16]
6-44-66-1
Goerges J.
Suarez Navarro C.[20]
6-47-65
Rogers S.
Kasatkina D.[31]
6-45-76-0
Kerber A.[1]
Duan Y.
7-636-2
R128
Brengle M.
Ostapenko J.
6-33-66-2
Witthoeft C.
Gibbs N.
6-36-3
Cepelova J.
Petkovic A.
6-26-4
Larsson J.
Niculescu M.
6-36-1
Mattek Sands B.
Siniakova K.
6-34-66-4
Shvedova Y.
Jankovic J.
4-66-47-63
Bondarenko K.
Badosa P.
6-47-5
Wang Q.
Vekic D.
0-66-46-2
Cepede Royg V.
Doi M.
6-26-4
Flipkens K.
Brady J.
3-66-37-5
Safarova L.
Wickmayer Y.
7-626-4
Tomljanovic A.
Linette M.
6-21-66-2
Lepchenko V.
Davis L.
6-36-3
Cirstea S.
Puig M.
6-26-4
Errani S.
Bencic B.
6-34-66-3
Mchale C.
Beck A.
6-727-56-0
Golubic V.
Pironkova T.
3-66-16-1
Arruabarrena L.
Vikhlyantseva N.
7-56-1
Parmentier P.
Dodin O.
6-26-1
Sasnovich A.
Cornet A.
6-41-66-4
Barty A.
Bouchard E.
6-45-76-3
Kontaveit A.
Nara K.
6-26-1
Osaka N.
Kucova K.
6-26-3
Minella M.
Pliskova K.
7-645-77-5
Townsend T.
Anisimova A.
2-66-26-3
Tig P.
Watson H.
7-646-1
Ozaki R.
Chirico L.
3-67-56-1
Goerges J.
Riske Amritraj A.
7-56-3
Rogers S.
Erakovic M.
4-66-37-64
Duan Y.
Siegemund L.
7-666-3
Peng S.
Kovinic D.
6-20-0
Haddad Maia B.
Tsurenko L.
3-2