Thomas Fabbiano vs Matteo Berrettini — Quanzhou CH Final
Quanzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Final
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 March 2017
hard
#43ATP
1831ELO
1797Hard ELO
$902kYTD
$15MCAREER
30 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
Fabbiano T.7-6 7-6
Berrettini M.
Fabbiano T.
77792
Berrettini M.
65670
Thomas Fabbiano defeated Matteo Berrettini 7-6 7-6 in the Quanzhou CH final on hard.
Key context
- Match story: Thomas Fabbiano won all two sets in tiebreaks against Matteo Berrettini.
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Serve vs return
This seasonServe-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Serve & return on hard
Fabbiano T.Berrettini M.
—
Serve
57
—
Return
10
Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
64%
66%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
66%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
69%
Return points won·Even
38%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
70%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.0
10.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
1.7
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
28
81
Break points saved·Clear edge
81
100
Break points won·Dominant
16
53
Deciding sets·Dominant
28
91
Tiebreaks·Dominant
44
98
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Freshness
Recent loadFreshness·
—
83
Berrettini M.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Fabbiano T.[6]
Berrettini M.
7-657-67
Quarter-finals
Marterer M.[5]
Bhambri Y.
6-36-2
Fabbiano T.[6]
Diez S.
6-06-2
Ivashka I.
Ignatik U.[7]
7-696-2
Berrettini M.
Lee D.[2]
6-46-766-1
R16
Lee D.[2]
Wu D.
7-646-766-2
Berrettini M.
Sousa P.
6-46-726-2
Bhambri Y.
Kavcic B.[4]
2-66-36-4
Marterer M.[5]
Oconnell C.
6-46-2
Fabbiano T.[6]
Nedovyesov A.
7-54-67-5
Diez S.
Karatsev A.
6-11-66-2
Ignatik U.[7]
Sekiguchi S.
7-6116-4
Ivashka I.
Hurkacz H.
6-44-67-5
R32
Fabbiano T.[6]
Sonego L.
6-26-4
Ignatik U.[7]
Munar J.
6-43-66-3
Wu D.
Napolitano S.
6-16-4
Sousa P.
Bai Y.
6-46-2
Kavcic B.[4]
Uchiyama Y.
6-37-5
Bhambri Y.
Ito T.
7-626-2
Oconnell C.
Pellegrino A.
6-16-3
Nedovyesov A.
Xia Z.
6-16-2
Diez S.
Zhang Z.
6-46-2
Karatsev A.
Vanni L.[3]
6-46-3
Sekiguchi S.
Velotti A.
7-656-4
Hurkacz H.
Milojevic N.
4-67-56-4
Ivashka I.
Sugita Y.[1]
5-76-16-4
Berrettini M.
Lopez Perez E.[8]
7-627-65
Marterer M.[5]
Matosevic M.
6-33-0
Lee D.[2]
Te R.
6-47-65