Hubert Hurkacz vs Di Wu — Shenzhen CH Round of 32

Shenzhen CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Hubert Hurkacz
POL
Hubert Hurkacz
#68ATP
1798ELO
1727Hard ELO
$1.3MYTD
$20MCAREER
29 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 March 2017
hard
CHN
Di Wu
34 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWLLL
Hurkacz H.
6-3 6-3
Wu D.
Hurkacz H.
662
Wu D.
330

Hubert Hurkacz defeated Di Wu 6-3 6-3 in the Shenzhen CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Di Wu came in defending last year's final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hurkacz H.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Wu D.

Wu D.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Hurkacz H.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Hurkacz H.Wu D.
67
Serve
—
0
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Hurkacz H.Wu D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
79%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
69%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
34%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
68%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
13.9
2.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.8
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 132). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hurkacz H.Wu D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
78
4
Break points saved·Dominant
100
37
Break points won·Clear edge
40
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
18
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Hurkacz H.Wu D.
Freshness·
81
—

Hurkacz H.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Sugita Y.[2]
Kavcic B.[6]
7-666-4
Albot R.[3]
Hurkacz H.
7-666-736-4
Semi-finals
Sugita Y.[2]
Bhambri Y.
4-66-46-3
Kavcic B.[6]
Vanni L.[5]
6-26-2
Hurkacz H.
Kavcic B.[2]
7-617-5
Albot R.[3]
Youzhny M.[1]
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Vanni L.[5]
Lee D.[4]
6-16-3
Sugita Y.[2]
Fabbiano T.[8]
6-26-4
Bhambri Y.
Marterer M.[7]
6-33-67-5
Kavcic B.[6]
Donskoy E.[1]
2-67-56-3
Hurkacz H.
Kwon S.
6-36-4
Youzhny M.[1]
Krajicek A.
6-16-3
Albot R.[3]
Jung J.
5-76-37-5
Kavcic B.[2]
Wu Y.
7-613-66-2
R16
Sugita Y.[2]
Satral J.
6-756-36-2
Fabbiano T.[8]
Skugor F.
6-46-4
Bhambri Y.
Milojevic N.
6-36-1
Marterer M.[7]
Ignatik U.
4-66-47-66
Vanni L.[5]
Bai Y.
6-16-2
Lee D.[4]
Hurkacz H.
6-32-67-65
Kavcic B.[6]
Wang C.
6-16-2
Donskoy E.[1]
Nedovyesov A.
6-26-4
Wu Y.
Li Z.
6-16-2
Hurkacz H.
Safwat M.
6-36-2
Jung J.
Santillan A.[6]
6-21-66-3
Albot R.[3]
Petrovic D.
3-66-36-3
Krajicek A.
Lee D.[9]
7-53-66-3
Youzhny M.[1]
Gunneswaran P.
6-26-4
Kwon S.
Polansky P.[4]
6-746-34-0
Kavcic B.[2]
Robert S.
6-36-2
R32
Sugita Y.[2]
Zhang Z.
6-26-2
Satral J.
Michon A.
6-16-2
Skugor F.
Velotti A.
6-06-1
Fabbiano T.[8]
Moriya H.
6-46-4
Milojevic N.
Carballes Baena R.[3]
4-66-47-5
Bhambri Y.
Napolitano S.
7-56-2
Vanni L.[5]
Lopez Perez E.
6-36-2
Bai Y.
Zheng W.
6-26-2
Hurkacz H.
Wu D.
6-36-3
Lee D.[4]
Ito T.
6-15-76-4
Kavcic B.[6]
Djere L.
6-36-1
Wang C.
Diez S.
3-66-46-3
Nedovyesov A.
Sousa P.
6-46-0
Donskoy E.[1]
Ivashka I.
3-66-37-60
Ignatik U.
Uchiyama Y.
5-2
Marterer M.[7]
Safiullin R.
7-696-3
Lee D.[9]
Nakagawa N.
6-16-4
Wu Y.
Monteiro T.[5]
6-36-4
Kwon S.
Zhang Z.
3-66-37-5
Safwat M.
Gabashvili T.
6-46-2
Santillan A.[6]
Doumbia S.
7-666-2
Jung J.
Matosevic M.
6-47-64
Albot R.[3]
Uchiyama Y.
6-26-1
Krajicek A.
Wang C.
6-36-2
Gunneswaran P.
Niesten M.
6-06-4
Youzhny M.[1]
Moriya H.
6-16-3
Robert S.
Wu D.
2-67-666-1
Li Z.
Uchida K.
6-46-4
Petrovic D.
Kecmanovic M.
2-66-16-4
Kavcic B.[2]
Te R.
6-46-3
Polansky P.[4]
Ghedin R.
6-46-3
Hurkacz H.
Hemery C.[8]
7-646-3