Lukas Rosol vs Norbert Gombos — Irving CH Qualifying Round 2

Irving CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
CZE
Lukas Rosol
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 March 2017
hard
Norbert Gombos
SVK2
Norbert Gombos
#370ATP
1472ELO
1452Hard ELO
35 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWL
Rosol L.
6-3 7-5
Gombos N.
Rosol L.
672
Gombos N.
350

Lukas Rosol defeated Norbert Gombos 6-3 7-5 in the Irving CH qualifying round 2 on hard. The result followed the form book — Lukas Rosol came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Lukas Rosol closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rosol L.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Gombos N.

Gombos N.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Rosol L.

Serve advantage — Gombos N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rosol L.Gombos N.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Even
4.6
4.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.3
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rosol L.Gombos N.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
51
41
Break points saved·Slight edge
89
83
Break points won·Slight edge
3
8
Deciding sets·Slight edge
78
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
36

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Rosol L.Gombos N.
Freshness·
—
79

Gombos N.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Q3
Kudla D.[4]
Bambridge L.
7-57-63
Rublev A.[6]
Ramanathan R.
3-66-36-2
Rosol L.
Gabashvili T.
6-23-66-4
Middelkoop M.
Paul T.
7-666-4
Q2
Rosol L.
Gombos N.[2]
6-37-5
Paul T.
Fratangelo B.[1]
7-656-4
Bambridge L.
Smith R.
7-56-3
Kudla D.[4]
Sarkissian A.
7-626-0
Rublev A.[6]
Gojowczyk P.
6-27-5
Ramanathan R.
Kovalik J.[3]
7-626-3
Gabashvili T.
Kamke T.[5]
3-66-36-2
Middelkoop M.
Soeda G.[8]
6-26-1
Q1
Bambridge L.
Bublik A.[7]
6-36-4
Smith R.
Renard L.
3-66-27-5
Sarkissian A.
Morris E.
6-26-4
Kudla D.[4]
Chang J.
6-36-0
Rublev A.[6]
Koolhof W.
6-46-2
Gojowczyk P.
Hach Verdugo H.
6-45-76-2
Ramanathan R.
Gaio F.
5-76-16-4
Kovalik J.[3]
Gray A.
6-06-3
Kamke T.[5]
Fucsovics M.
W/O
Gabashvili T.
Carvalho R.
6-46-0
Rosol L.
Pavic A.
6-26-4
Gombos N.[2]
Mektic N.
5-76-26-1
Soeda G.[8]
Escobar G.
6-25-77-65
Middelkoop M.
Galan D.
6-26-1
Paul T.
Venus M.
6-17-61
Fratangelo B.[1]
Wood C.
6-46-1