Thomas Fabbiano vs Franko Skugor — Shenzhen CH Round of 16

Shenzhen CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ITA8
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 March 2017
hard
CRO
Franko Skugor
38 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLLLWWL
Fabbiano T.
6-4 6-4
Skugor F.
Fabbiano T.
662
Skugor F.
440

Thomas Fabbiano defeated Franko Skugor 6-4 6-4 in the Shenzhen CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Thomas Fabbiano came in leading the head-to-head 2–0, defending last year's semi-final. Thomas Fabbiano extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Thomas Fabbiano edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-06-26EastbourneR32grassThomas Fabbiano7-6(5) 6-4
2016-07-18UmagR32clayThomas Fabbiano6-0 4-1 RET

Serve vs return

This season
Fabbiano T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Skugor F.

Skugor F.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Serve advantage — Skugor F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fabbiano T.Skugor F.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.0
6.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 80). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fabbiano T.Skugor F.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
28
35
Break points saved·Even
81
80
Break points won·Even
16
16
Deciding sets·Dominant
28
53
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
44
33

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Sugita Y.[2]
Kavcic B.[6]
7-666-4
Albot R.[3]
Hurkacz H.
7-666-736-4
Semi-finals
Sugita Y.[2]
Bhambri Y.
4-66-46-3
Kavcic B.[6]
Vanni L.[5]
6-26-2
Hurkacz H.
Kavcic B.[2]
7-617-5
Albot R.[3]
Youzhny M.[1]
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Vanni L.[5]
Lee D.[4]
6-16-3
Sugita Y.[2]
Fabbiano T.[8]
6-26-4
Bhambri Y.
Marterer M.[7]
6-33-67-5
Kavcic B.[6]
Donskoy E.[1]
2-67-56-3
Hurkacz H.
Kwon S.
6-36-4
Youzhny M.[1]
Krajicek A.
6-16-3
Albot R.[3]
Jung J.
5-76-37-5
Kavcic B.[2]
Wu Y.
7-613-66-2
R16
Sugita Y.[2]
Satral J.
6-756-36-2
Fabbiano T.[8]
Skugor F.
6-46-4
Bhambri Y.
Milojevic N.
6-36-1
Marterer M.[7]
Ignatik U.
4-66-47-66
Vanni L.[5]
Bai Y.
6-16-2
Lee D.[4]
Hurkacz H.
6-32-67-65
Kavcic B.[6]
Wang C.
6-16-2
Donskoy E.[1]
Nedovyesov A.
6-26-4
Wu Y.
Li Z.
6-16-2
Hurkacz H.
Safwat M.
6-36-2
Jung J.
Santillan A.[6]
6-21-66-3
Albot R.[3]
Petrovic D.
3-66-36-3
Krajicek A.
Lee D.[9]
7-53-66-3
Youzhny M.[1]
Gunneswaran P.
6-26-4
Kwon S.
Polansky P.[4]
6-746-34-0
Kavcic B.[2]
Robert S.
6-36-2
R32
Sugita Y.[2]
Zhang Z.
6-26-2
Satral J.
Michon A.
6-16-2
Skugor F.
Velotti A.
6-06-1
Fabbiano T.[8]
Moriya H.
6-46-4
Milojevic N.
Carballes Baena R.[3]
4-66-47-5
Bhambri Y.
Napolitano S.
7-56-2
Vanni L.[5]
Lopez Perez E.
6-36-2
Bai Y.
Zheng W.
6-26-2
Hurkacz H.
Wu D.
6-36-3
Lee D.[4]
Ito T.
6-15-76-4
Kavcic B.[6]
Djere L.
6-36-1
Wang C.
Diez S.
3-66-46-3
Nedovyesov A.
Sousa P.
6-46-0
Donskoy E.[1]
Ivashka I.
3-66-37-60
Ignatik U.
Uchiyama Y.
5-2
Marterer M.[7]
Safiullin R.
7-696-3
Lee D.[9]
Nakagawa N.
6-16-4
Wu Y.
Monteiro T.[5]
6-36-4
Kwon S.
Zhang Z.
3-66-37-5
Safwat M.
Gabashvili T.
6-46-2
Santillan A.[6]
Doumbia S.
7-666-2
Jung J.
Matosevic M.
6-47-64
Albot R.[3]
Uchiyama Y.
6-26-1
Krajicek A.
Wang C.
6-36-2
Gunneswaran P.
Niesten M.
6-06-4
Youzhny M.[1]
Moriya H.
6-16-3
Robert S.
Wu D.
2-67-666-1
Li Z.
Uchida K.
6-46-4
Petrovic D.
Kecmanovic M.
2-66-16-4
Kavcic B.[2]
Te R.
6-46-3
Polansky P.[4]
Ghedin R.
6-46-3
Hurkacz H.
Hemery C.[8]
7-646-3