Rafael Nadal defeated Fernando Verdasco 6-3 7-5 in the Indian Wells Masters round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Rafael Nadal came in leading the head-to-head 16–3, defending last year's semi-final. Rafael Nadal extended the head-to-head to 17–3.
| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-13 | Rome Masters | QF | clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 6-0 |
| 2016-03-07 | Indian Wells Masters | R32 | hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-0 7-6(9) |
| 2016-01-18 | Australian Open | R128 | hard | Fernando Verdasco | 7-6(6) 4-6 3-6 7-6(4) 6-2 |
| 2015-07-27 | Hamburg | R32 | clay | Rafael Nadal | 3-6 6-1 6-1 |
| 2015-03-25 | Miami Masters | R32 | hard | Fernando Verdasco | 6-4 2-6 6-3 |
| 2012-05-06 | Madrid Masters | R16 | clay | Fernando Verdasco | 6-3 3-6 7-5 |
| 2012-04-23 | Barcelona | SF | clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-0 6-4 |
| 2011-08-14 | Cincinnati Masters | R16 | hard | Rafael Nadal | 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 7-6(9) |
| 2010-08-30 | US Open | QF | hard | Rafael Nadal | 7-5 6-3 6-4 |
| 2010-04-11 | Monte Carlo Masters | F | clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-0 6-1 |
| 2009-05-10 | Madrid Masters | QF | clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 7-5 |
| 2009-04-27 | Rome Masters | QF | clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-3 6-3 |
| 2009-01-19 | Australian Open | SF | hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(2) 6-7(1) 6-4 |
| 2008-05-25 | Roland Garros | R16 | clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-1 6-0 6-2 |
| 2007-03-05 | Indian Wells Masters | R32 | hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2006-06-12 | Queen's Club | R16 | grass | Rafael Nadal | 2-6 7-6(3) 7-6(3) |
| 2005-07-18 | Stuttgart | R16 | grass | Rafael Nadal | 6-3 6-2 |
| 2005-03-21 | Miami Masters | R32 | hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-2 6-2 |
| 2005-01-03 | Doha | R16 | hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-2 6-4 |
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About