Arthur De Greef vs Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo — Santiago CH Round of 32
Santiago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 March 2017
clay
De Greef A.7-6 6-2
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
De Greef A.
7862
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
6620
Arthur De Greef defeated Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo 7-6 6-2 in the Santiago CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's quarter-final. Arthur De Greef claimed a first win over Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.
Key context
- Match story: Arthur De Greef closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.
Head to head
0–1| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-13 | Buenos Aires | Q1 | clay | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | 6-4 6-2 |
Serve vs return
This seasonBaseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
57%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
45%
Service points won·Even
59%
58%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.6
2.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.1
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (157 vs 31). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Even
25
29
Break points saved·Slight edge
56
63
Break points won·Slight edge
20
30
Deciding sets·Clear edge
41
23
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
47
70
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Semi-finals
Dutra Silva R.[1]
Bolelli S.
6-46-2
Jarry N.
Clezar G.
W/O
Arevalo M.[8]
Dutra Silva R.[1]
6-36-2
Jarry N.[2]
Monteiro T.[5]
6-26-2
Quarter-finals
Clezar G.
Andreozzi G.
6-42-66-3
Bolelli S.
Daniel T.[4]
6-46-4
Dutra Silva R.[1]
Lindell C.
6-14-66-2
Jarry N.
Souza J.[8]
7-657-66
Monteiro T.[5]
Berlocq C.[3]
6-30-66-4
Dutra Silva R.[1]
Heras P.
6-46-4
Jarry N.[2]
Galan D.
6-46-2
Arevalo M.[8]
Elias G.[4]
7-643-66-4
R16
Clezar G.
Kicker N.[2]
4-66-47-5
Andreozzi G.
De Greef A.[5]
6-756-46-1
Jarry N.
Gonzalez M.
6-46-4
Bolelli S.
Mayer L.
7-654-66-3
Daniel T.[4]
Garin C.
6-46-0
Dutra Silva R.[1]
Zampieri C.
6-36-3
Lindell C.
Cecchinato M.
7-664-67-65
Souza J.[8]
Ruud C.
5-76-47-5
Galan D.
Sorgi J.
6-34-66-3
Monteiro T.[5]
Carballes Baena R.
5-77-626-2
Arevalo M.[8]
Oliveira G.
6-44-67-5
Elias G.[4]
Cachin P.
6-776-47-5
Dutra Silva R.[1]
Londero J.
6-32-66-2
Berlocq C.[3]
Hernandez J.
6-16-4
Jarry N.[2]
Lama G.
7-656-2
Heras P.
Bagnis F.[6]
6-45-76-3
R32
Clezar G.
Lamasine T.
3-66-46-4
Andreozzi G.
Podlipnik Castillo H.
6-26-2
De Greef A.[5]
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
7-666-2
Gonzalez M.
Melzer G.[3]
6-46-1
Jarry N.
Varillas J.
6-16-4
Souza J.[8]
Barrios Vera T.
6-36-4
Mayer L.
Lama G.
6-36-1
Garin C.
Bourgue M.
6-46-3
Daniel T.[4]
Coria F.
6-43-66-1
Lindell C.
Cervantes Huegun I.[6]
6-33-66-0
Cecchinato M.
Hernandez J.
7-656-4
Zampieri C.
Dellien H.
6-34-66-3
Dutra Silva R.[1]
Samper Montana J.
7-56-0
Bolelli S.
Giannessi A.[7]
6-43-2
Kicker N.[2]
Janvier M.
7-646-4
Ruud C.
Soto M.
6-26-1
Galan D.
Linzer M.
0-66-22-0
Monteiro T.[5]
Marti J.
5-76-46-3
Lama G.
Clezar G.
6-42-66-3
Sorgi J.
Balazs A.[7]
6-46-2
Berlocq C.[3]
Kuzmanov D.
6-36-0
Hernandez J.
Naser J.
6-16-1
Carballes Baena R.
Souza J.
6-47-5
Oliveira G.
Rola B.
6-47-65
Cachin P.
Collarini A.
6-36-1
Elias G.[4]
Munar J.
7-656-0
Bagnis F.[6]
Gonzalez M.
7-656-0
Londero J.
Sakamoto P.
6-16-2
Dutra Silva R.[1]
Ficovich J.
6-36-4
Heras P.
Saez J.
7-636-4
Jarry N.[2]
Coria F.
6-46-4
Arevalo M.[8]
Arguello F.
6-26-1