Thomas Fabbiano vs Uladzimir Ignatik — Zhuhai CH Semi-final

Zhuhai CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
ITA7
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 March 2017
hard
BLR8
Uladzimir Ignatik
#1413ATP
36 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
Fabbiano T.
7-6 6-4
Ignatik U.
Fabbiano T.
7862
Ignatik U.
6640

Thomas Fabbiano defeated Uladzimir Ignatik 7-6 6-4 in the Zhuhai CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Thomas Fabbiano came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending the title. Thomas Fabbiano extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-01-18Australian OpenQ1hardThomas Fabbiano5-7 6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Fabbiano T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ignatik U.

Ignatik U.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fabbiano T.Ignatik U.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.0
7.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fabbiano T.Ignatik U.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
28
0
Break points saved·Dominant
81
53
Break points won·Slight edge
16
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
28
2
Tiebreaks·Dominant
44
6

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Donskoy E.[1]
Fabbiano T.[7]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Fabbiano T.[7]
Ignatik U.[8]
7-666-4
Donskoy E.[1]
Bhambri Y.
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Fabbiano T.[7]
Zhang Z.
6-26-1
Ignatik U.[8]
Vanni L.[4]
6-46-4
Donskoy E.[1]
De Loore J.
6-36-4
Bhambri Y.
Velotti A.
6-12-1
R16
Zhang Z.
Sugita Y.[2]
6-756-47-65
Fabbiano T.[7]
Uchiyama Y.
6-16-0
Vanni L.[4]
Jung J.
6-46-4
Ignatik U.[8]
Sonego L.
6-46-4
Bhambri Y.
Kavcic B.[5]
6-16-4
Velotti A.
Napolitano S.
7-634-66-2
De Loore J.
Marterer M.[6]
6-46-2
Donskoy E.[1]
Bai Y.
6-36-4
R32
Sonego L.
Maden Y.
6-24-1
Sugita Y.[2]
Lopez Perez E.
6-26-4
Zhang Z.
Wu D.
1-66-26-4
Uchiyama Y.
Te R.
1-67-607-5
Fabbiano T.[7]
Djere L.
6-46-3
Vanni L.[4]
Moriya H.
6-26-1
Jung J.
Satral J.
1-66-16-2
Ignatik U.[8]
Masur D.
6-26-4
Kavcic B.[5]
Sousa P.
6-36-3
Bhambri Y.
Mott B.
6-26-0
Velotti A.
Diez S.
2-67-637-62
Napolitano S.
Lee D.[3]
6-47-65
Marterer M.[6]
Munar J.
6-46-726-4
Bai Y.
Ivashka I.
6-35-76-4
Donskoy E.[1]
Tepavac M.
6-746-47-5
De Loore J.
Wu Y.
6-36-2