Hugo Dellien vs Joao Pedro Sorgi — Santiago CH Qualifying Round 1

Santiago CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Hugo Dellien
BOL
Hugo Dellien
#144ATP
1637ELO
1624Clay ELO
$217kYTD
$3.1MCAREER
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 March 2017
clay
BRA4
Joao Pedro Sorgi
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWW
Dellien H.
7-6 7-6
Sorgi J.
Dellien H.
77772
Sorgi J.
63650

Hugo Dellien defeated Joao Pedro Sorgi 7-6 7-6 in the Santiago CH qualifying round 1 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Joao Pedro Sorgi came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Dellien H.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Sorgi J.

Sorgi J.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Dellien H.

Serve advantage — Dellien H.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Dellien H.Sorgi J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
71%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.3
3.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.4
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 82). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Dellien H.Sorgi J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
61
18
Break points saved·Dominant
89
42
Break points won·Even
32
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
34
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
47
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Dellien H.Sorgi J.
Freshness·
51
—

Dellien H.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 126 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q3
Dellien H.
Dutra Da Silva D.[8]
7-56-2
Varillas J.
Arguello F.
6-26-4
Lindell C.[6]
Gomez E.[2]
6-23-67-5
Clezar G.[1]
Londero J.[5]
6-46-3
Kuzmanov D.[2]
Tabilo A.
7-657-5
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Agamenone F.[7]
7-623-0
Heras P.[4]
Nagy P.[8]
6-46-1
Sakamoto P.[5]
Gonzalez A.[3]
6-25-76-4
Q2
Dutra Da Silva D.[8]
Urzua Rivera R.
6-26-2
Dellien H.
Fleming D.
6-46-2
Varillas J.
Santanna B.[7]
3-67-666-1
Arguello F.
Vernier M.
6-26-4
Lindell C.[6]
Hocevar R.
1-66-36-2
Gomez E.[2]
Rivera Aranguiz G.
6-46-4
Londero J.[5]
Molteni A.
6-46-4
Clezar G.[1]
Montero J.
6-16-0
Sakamoto P.[5]
Nunez V.
6-27-65
Gonzalez A.[3]
Acevedo N.
6-44-66-1
Nagy P.[8]
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-47-64
Heras P.[4]
Bruna E.
6-26-4
Tabilo A.
Olivieri G.[6]
6-06-4
Kuzmanov D.[2]
Neis F.
7-647-5
Agamenone F.[7]
Vernier M.
6-46-3
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Molteni A.
6-06-2
Q1
Urzua Rivera R.
Bruna N.
6-26-3
Dutra Da Silva D.[8]
Zormann Da Silva M.
6-41-66-3
Fleming D.
Leiva Biason O.
6-36-2
Dellien H.
Sorgi J.[4]
7-637-65
Varillas J.
Kohl C.
6-36-0
Arguello F.
Alvarez Guzman M.
6-26-0
Vernier M.
Lipovsek Puches T.[3]
6-26-1
Lindell C.[6]
Nunez V.
6-16-2
Hocevar R.
Naser J.
4-67-56-3
Rivera Aranguiz G.
Navarro S.
6-16-0
Gomez E.[2]
Luz O.
7-656-4
Londero J.[5]
De Paula F.
6-37-62
Molteni A.
Feitt F.
6-16-4
Montero J.
Abde Celis J.
7-56-3
Clezar G.[1]
Bruna E.
6-26-3
Vernier M.
Urzua Rivera R.
6-41-0
Ugo Carabelli C.
Fleming D.
4-66-42-0
Bruna E.
Feitt F.
6-46-2
Nunez V.
Urruticoechea G.
6-17-5
Tabilo A.
Navarro S.
6-36-1
Neis F.
Hudson O.
6-26-3
Molteni A.
Cuevas C.
6-06-1
Acevedo N.
Gelhardt L.
6-27-5