Kate Makarova vs Dominika Cibulkova — Dubai Round of 32
Dubai · WTA · Round of 32
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 20 February 2017
hard
Makarova K.6-2 4-6 6-2
Cibulkova D.
Makarova K.
6462
Cibulkova D.
2621
Kate Makarova defeated Dominika Cibulkova 6-2 4-6 6-2 in the Dubai round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Dominika Cibulkova came in leading the head-to-head 4–2. Kate Makarova narrowed the head-to-head to 4–3.
Key context
- Match story: Kate Makarova closed it out in three sets, 6–2 4–6 6–2.
Head to head
2–4| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-25 | Eastbourne | R64 | grass | Dominika Cibulkova | 7-5 6-4 |
| 2017-05-15 | Rome | R32 | clay | Kate Makarova | 1-6 6-1 6-3 |
| 2017-01-16 | Australian Open | R32 | hard | Kate Makarova | 6-2 6-7(3) 6-3 |
| 2014-03-03 | Indian Wells | R32 | hard | Dominika Cibulkova | 6-4 7-5 |
| 2013-01-07 | Sydney | R16 | hard | Dominika Cibulkova | 7-6(3) 1-6 7-6(1) |
| 2012-10-15 | Moscow | R32 | hard | Dominika Cibulkova | 2-6 6-4 6-2 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Cibulkova D.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
65%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
48%
Service points won·Even
57%
57%
Return points won·Even
42%
44%
Break points saved·Even
54%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
0.9
Double faults / match·Even
3.5
3.5
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (91 vs 107). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
59
71
Break points saved·Even
78
78
Break points won·Slight edge
77
87
Deciding sets·Clear edge
60
72
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
69
83
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
21°CMainly clear
Wind 18 km/hHumidity 54%
Draw
Quarter-finals
Sevastova A.
Wang Q.
6-47-5
Wozniacki C.[10]
Bellis C.
6-36-2
Svitolina E.[7]
Davis L.
6-06-4
Kerber A.[1]
Konjuh A.
6-36-2
R16
Wozniacki C.[10]
Bondarenko K.
3-66-26-3
Konjuh A.
Vesnina E.[8]
3-66-47-64
Wang Q.
Mladenovic K.
6-16-4
Sevastova A.
Peng S.
6-46-3
Bellis C.
Radwanska A.[4]
6-42-66-2
Svitolina E.[7]
Mchale C.
4-66-46-3
Davis L.
Makarova K.
4-66-16-3
Kerber A.[1]
Puig M.
6-26-3
R32
Mladenovic K.
Pliskova K.[2]
6-26-4
Wang Q.
Jabeur O.
6-36-1
Sevastova A.
Riske Amritraj A.
6-46-736-2
Peng S.
Strycova B.[9]
6-36-2
Radwanska A.[4]
Mertens E.
6-36-2
Bellis C.
Siegemund L.
7-57-63
Wozniacki C.[10]
Golubic V.
6-46-2
Svitolina E.[7]
Zheng S.
7-56-1
Mchale C.
Osaka N.
6-36-4
Davis L.
Pliskova K.
1-66-16-3
Makarova K.
Cibulkova D.[3]
6-24-66-2
Vesnina E.[8]
Doi M.
6-27-5
Konjuh A.
Stosur S.[12]
6-46-3
Puig M.
Garcia C.[15]
6-14-66-2
Kerber A.[1]
Barthel M.
6-46-3
Bondarenko K.
Muguruza G.[5]
4-1
R64
Mladenovic K.
Siniakova K.
6-36-3
Jabeur O.
Pavlyuchenkova A.[14]
7-662-66-4
Riske Amritraj A.
Vandeweghe C.[11]
6-46-4
Sevastova A.
Begu I.
6-17-5
Siegemund L.
Soler Espinosa S.
6-746-47-63
Bellis C.
Putintseva Y.[17]
6-17-5
Bondarenko K.
Sabalenka A.
4-66-46-3
Mchale C.
Bertens K.[13]
6-756-36-4
Pliskova K.
Vinci R.[16]
3-67-56-3
Davis L.
Minella M.
2-66-26-1
Stosur S.[12]
Zhang K.
6-36-3
Garcia C.[15]
Larsson J.
6-36-3
Puig M.
Shvedova Y.
6-34-66-4
Wang Q.
Ostapenko J.
7-616-2
Peng S.
Tsurenko L.
6-16-1
Mertens E.
Pironkova T.
6-36-2
Wozniacki C.[10]
Kasatkina D.
6-27-5
Golubic V.
Buyukakcay C.
6-746-36-2
Zheng S.
Arruabarrena L.
6-43-66-3
Osaka N.
Chang K.
6-26-4
Makarova K.
Zhu L.
6-36-1
Doi M.
Brengle M.
6-26-746-3
Konjuh A.
Zhang S.
6-06-1
Barthel M.
Jankovic J.
6-16-3