Kirsten Flipkens vs Monica NiculescuFed Cup WG2 R1: ROU vs BEL Round Robin

Fed Cup WG2 R1: ROU vs BEL · WTA · Round Robin
40 yrs · 165 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Saturday, 11 February 2017
hard
38 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Flipkens K.
6-3 6-4
Niculescu M.
Flipkens K.
662
Niculescu M.
340

Kirsten Flipkens defeated Monica Niculescu 6-3 6-4 in the Fed Cup WG2 R1: ROU vs BEL round robin on hard. The result followed the form book — Kirsten Flipkens came in leading the head-to-head 4–3. Kirsten Flipkens extended the head-to-head to 5–3.

Key context

Head to head

43
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-02-19BudapestR32clayKirsten Flipkens6-3 7-5
2017-01-09HobartR16hardMonica Niculescu6-3 6-2
2016-10-17LuxembourgR32hardMonica Niculescu6-4 6-2
2015-04-06KatowiceR16hardKirsten Flipkens6-7(6) 6-1 6-4
2015-02-09AntwerpR32hardMonica Niculescu6-3 6-2
2013-03-04Indian WellsR64hardKirsten Flipkens4-6 6-4 6-3
2013-01-07HobartQFhardKirsten Flipkens2-6 6-4 6-0

Serve vs return

This season
Flipkens K.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Niculescu M.

Niculescu M.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Flipkens K.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Clear edge
62%
78%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
56%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
46%
Service points won·Even
57%
54%
Return points won·Even
43%
47%
Break points saved·Even
55%
52%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.3
0.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
1.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
52
12
Break points saved·Dominant
44
14
Break points won·Clear edge
65
84
Deciding sets·Dominant
83
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
78
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About