Noah Rubin vs Luke Saville — Launceston CH Round of 32

Launceston CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA7
Noah Rubin
30 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 February 2017
hard
AUS
Luke Saville
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLW
Rubin N.
7-6 7-6
Saville L.
Rubin N.
77782
Saville L.
64660

Noah Rubin defeated Luke Saville 7-6 7-6 in the Launceston CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Luke Saville came in defending last year's semi-final, but Noah Rubin had been the form player, winning 4 of their last 6 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rubin N.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Saville L.

Saville L.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Rubin N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rubin N.Saville L.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.7
4.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (189 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rubin N.Saville L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
49
19
Break points saved·Slight edge
80
69
Break points won·Clear edge
31
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
54
29
Tiebreaks·Dominant
80
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Rubin N.[7]
Krueger M.
6-06-1
Semi-finals
Rubin N.[7]
Nguyen D.
6-36-2
Krueger M.
Safwat M.[6]
7-54-66-3
Quarter-finals
Nguyen D.
Bellotti R.
6-44-66-0
Rubin N.[7]
Whittington A.[4]
5-76-16-3
Krueger M.
Yang T.
6-47-5
Safwat M.[6]
Bolt A.
7-636-3
R16
Bellotti R.
Purcell M.
4-66-36-2
Nguyen D.
Polmans M.
7-616-4
Whittington A.[4]
Klein B.
6-43-66-3
Rubin N.[7]
Mousley B.
6-46-4
Krueger M.
Jasika O.
6-46-0
Yang T.
Banes M.
3-66-27-5
Safwat M.[6]
Oconnell C.
6-32-66-3
Bolt A.
De Minaur A.
3-66-47-5
R32
Purcell M.
Fanselow S.
4-66-47-65
Polmans M.
King E.
6-736-46-4
Whittington A.[4]
Rola B.
1-67-616-3
Mousley B.
Margaroli L.
7-646-4
Krueger M.
Santillan A.[8]
6-47-5
Yang T.
Nolan D.
6-26-3
Banes M.
Jung J.[3]
6-44-66-3
Safwat M.[6]
Bourchier H.
6-46-726-3
Oconnell C.
Kelly D.
7-56-4
Bolt A.
Frawley J.
6-42-66-2
De Minaur A.
Soeda G.[1]
3-66-46-3
Bellotti R.
Satral J.[2]
6-23-1
Nguyen D.
Pasha N.
7-637-61
Rubin N.[7]
Saville L.
7-647-66
Klein B.
Mott B.
6-36-4
Jasika O.
Popko D.
6-37-5