Vasek Pospisil vs Marco Trungelliti — San Francisco CH Round of 32

San Francisco CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CAN7
Vasek Pospisil
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 February 2017
hard
Marco Trungelliti
ARG
Marco Trungelliti
#99ATP
1627ELO
1496Hard ELO
$395kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
36 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLWLWLWW
Pospisil V.
7-6 3-6 6-4
Trungelliti M.
Pospisil V.
77362
Trungelliti M.
65641

Vasek Pospisil defeated Marco Trungelliti 7-6 3-6 6-4 in the San Francisco CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Vasek Pospisil closed it out in three sets, 7–6 3–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Pospisil V.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Trungelliti M.

Trungelliti M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Pospisil V.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pospisil V.Trungelliti M.
1st serve in·Even
58%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
78%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
40%
Break points saved·Even
66%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.9
3.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.8
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pospisil V.Trungelliti M.
Clutch Rating·Even
49
50
Break points saved·Slight edge
96
87
Break points won·Clear edge
7
24
Deciding sets·Dominant
62
87
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Pospisil V.Trungelliti M.
Freshness·
—
89

Trungelliti M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 17 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Zhang Z.
Pospisil V.[7]
7-53-66-2
Semi-finals
Zhang Z.
Laaksonen H.[5]
6-47-67
Pospisil V.[7]
Mmoh M.
6-16-2
Quarter-finals
Zhang Z.
Ito T.
6-26-3
Laaksonen H.[5]
Quigley E.
7-646-2
Pospisil V.[7]
Tiafoe F.[1]
6-16-4
Mmoh M.
Kudla D.[8]
2-66-36-4
R16
Zhang Z.
Schnur B.
6-46-2
Ito T.
Polansky P.[6]
7-633-66-4
Quigley E.
Smith J.
2-67-56-3
Laaksonen H.[5]
Ramanathan R.
6-17-61
Kudla D.[8]
Mcdonald M.
7-654-66-2
Mmoh M.
Kukushkin M.[3]
6-36-3
Pospisil V.[7]
Opelka R.
6-756-16-3
Tiafoe F.[1]
Shane R.
7-646-746-2
R32
Ito T.
King D.
7-646-2
Polansky P.[6]
Novikov D.
6-26-2
Smith J.
Donaldson J.[4]
6-37-64
Quigley E.
Smyczek T.
6-34-67-5
Ramanathan R.
Giron M.
2-66-46-4
Laaksonen H.[5]
Barton M.
6-46-3
Kudla D.[8]
Sarmiento R.
6-776-16-4
Mcdonald M.
Coppejans K.
6-26-2
Mmoh M.
Sandgren T.
2-66-47-61
Kukushkin M.[3]
Milojevic N.
7-636-2
Opelka R.
Bangoura S.
6-36-4
Shane R.
Caruso S.
7-636-4
Tiafoe F.[1]
Klahn B.
6-46-4
Zhang Z.
Fritz T.[2]
6-44-66-2
Schnur B.
Ymer E.
7-646-4
Pospisil V.[7]
Trungelliti M.
7-653-66-4