Daniel Nguyen vs Marc Polmans — Launceston CH Round of 16

Launceston CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Daniel Nguyen
35 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 February 2017
hard
Marc Polmans
AUS
Marc Polmans
#344ATP
1449ELO
1414Hard ELO
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLWWL
Nguyen D.
7-6 6-4
Polmans M.
Nguyen D.
7762
Polmans M.
6140

Daniel Nguyen defeated Marc Polmans 7-6 6-4 in the Launceston CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Marc Polmans came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nguyen D.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Polmans M.

Polmans M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Nguyen D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nguyen D.Polmans M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
49%
Service points won·Even
58%
61%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.9
4.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.1
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (68 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nguyen D.Polmans M.
Clutch Rating·Even
21
23
Break points saved·Dominant
37
79
Break points won·Clear edge
22
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
59
31
Tiebreaks·Even
23
24

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nguyen D.Polmans M.
Freshness·
—
100

Polmans M.: 21 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Rubin N.[7]
Krueger M.
6-06-1
Semi-finals
Rubin N.[7]
Nguyen D.
6-36-2
Krueger M.
Safwat M.[6]
7-54-66-3
Quarter-finals
Nguyen D.
Bellotti R.
6-44-66-0
Rubin N.[7]
Whittington A.[4]
5-76-16-3
Krueger M.
Yang T.
6-47-5
Safwat M.[6]
Bolt A.
7-636-3
R16
Bellotti R.
Purcell M.
4-66-36-2
Nguyen D.
Polmans M.
7-616-4
Whittington A.[4]
Klein B.
6-43-66-3
Rubin N.[7]
Mousley B.
6-46-4
Krueger M.
Jasika O.
6-46-0
Yang T.
Banes M.
3-66-27-5
Safwat M.[6]
Oconnell C.
6-32-66-3
Bolt A.
De Minaur A.
3-66-47-5
R32
Purcell M.
Fanselow S.
4-66-47-65
Polmans M.
King E.
6-736-46-4
Whittington A.[4]
Rola B.
1-67-616-3
Mousley B.
Margaroli L.
7-646-4
Krueger M.
Santillan A.[8]
6-47-5
Yang T.
Nolan D.
6-26-3
Banes M.
Jung J.[3]
6-44-66-3
Safwat M.[6]
Bourchier H.
6-46-726-3
Oconnell C.
Kelly D.
7-56-4
Bolt A.
Frawley J.
6-42-66-2
De Minaur A.
Soeda G.[1]
3-66-46-3
Bellotti R.
Satral J.[2]
6-23-1
Nguyen D.
Pasha N.
7-637-61
Rubin N.[7]
Saville L.
7-647-66
Klein B.
Mott B.
6-36-4
Jasika O.
Popko D.
6-37-5