Michael Mmoh vs Tennys Sandgren — San Francisco CH Round of 32

San Francisco CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Michael Mmoh
USA
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 February 2017
hard
USA
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Mmoh M.
2-6 6-4 7-6
Sandgren T.
Mmoh M.
26772
Sandgren T.
64611

Michael Mmoh defeated Tennys Sandgren 2-6 6-4 7-6 in the San Francisco CH round of 32 on hard. Michael Mmoh extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-07-24AtlantaQ1hardMichael Mmoh4-6 7-6(8) 6-4
2017-07-03WimbledonQ1grassTennys Sandgren6-3 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Mmoh M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Sandgren T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Serve advantage — Mmoh M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mmoh M.Sandgren T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.0
8.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.8
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mmoh M.Sandgren T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
66
36
Break points saved·Even
91
92
Break points won·Dominant
31
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
90
28
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
77
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Mmoh M.Sandgren T.
Freshness·
95
—

Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Zhang Z.
Pospisil V.[7]
7-53-66-2
Semi-finals
Zhang Z.
Laaksonen H.[5]
6-47-67
Pospisil V.[7]
Mmoh M.
6-16-2
Quarter-finals
Zhang Z.
Ito T.
6-26-3
Laaksonen H.[5]
Quigley E.
7-646-2
Pospisil V.[7]
Tiafoe F.[1]
6-16-4
Mmoh M.
Kudla D.[8]
2-66-36-4
R16
Zhang Z.
Schnur B.
6-46-2
Ito T.
Polansky P.[6]
7-633-66-4
Quigley E.
Smith J.
2-67-56-3
Laaksonen H.[5]
Ramanathan R.
6-17-61
Kudla D.[8]
Mcdonald M.
7-654-66-2
Mmoh M.
Kukushkin M.[3]
6-36-3
Pospisil V.[7]
Opelka R.
6-756-16-3
Tiafoe F.[1]
Shane R.
7-646-746-2
R32
Ito T.
King D.
7-646-2
Polansky P.[6]
Novikov D.
6-26-2
Smith J.
Donaldson J.[4]
6-37-64
Quigley E.
Smyczek T.
6-34-67-5
Ramanathan R.
Giron M.
2-66-46-4
Laaksonen H.[5]
Barton M.
6-46-3
Kudla D.[8]
Sarmiento R.
6-776-16-4
Mcdonald M.
Coppejans K.
6-26-2
Mmoh M.
Sandgren T.
2-66-47-61
Kukushkin M.[3]
Milojevic N.
7-636-2
Opelka R.
Bangoura S.
6-36-4
Shane R.
Caruso S.
7-636-4
Tiafoe F.[1]
Klahn B.
6-46-4
Zhang Z.
Fritz T.[2]
6-44-66-2
Schnur B.
Ymer E.
7-646-4
Pospisil V.[7]
Trungelliti M.
7-653-66-4