Mitchell Krueger vs Mohamed Safwat — Launceston CH Semi-final

Launceston CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Mitchell Krueger
USA
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1436Hard ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 February 2017
hard
EGY6
Mohamed Safwat
#1884ATP
35 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLLLW
Krueger M.
7-5 4-6 6-3
Safwat M.
Krueger M.
7462
Safwat M.
5631

Mitchell Krueger defeated Mohamed Safwat 7-5 4-6 6-3 in the Launceston CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Krueger M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Safwat M.

Safwat M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Serve advantage — Krueger M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Krueger M.Safwat M.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.5
3.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Krueger M.Safwat M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
16
8
Break points saved·Clear edge
87
64
Break points won·Clear edge
14
2
Deciding sets·Even
13
17
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
0
21

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Krueger M.Safwat M.
Freshness·
87
—

Krueger M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Rubin N.[7]
Krueger M.
6-06-1
Semi-finals
Rubin N.[7]
Nguyen D.
6-36-2
Krueger M.
Safwat M.[6]
7-54-66-3
Quarter-finals
Nguyen D.
Bellotti R.
6-44-66-0
Rubin N.[7]
Whittington A.[4]
5-76-16-3
Krueger M.
Yang T.
6-47-5
Safwat M.[6]
Bolt A.
7-636-3
R16
Bellotti R.
Purcell M.
4-66-36-2
Nguyen D.
Polmans M.
7-616-4
Whittington A.[4]
Klein B.
6-43-66-3
Rubin N.[7]
Mousley B.
6-46-4
Krueger M.
Jasika O.
6-46-0
Yang T.
Banes M.
3-66-27-5
Safwat M.[6]
Oconnell C.
6-32-66-3
Bolt A.
De Minaur A.
3-66-47-5
R32
Purcell M.
Fanselow S.
4-66-47-65
Polmans M.
King E.
6-736-46-4
Whittington A.[4]
Rola B.
1-67-616-3
Mousley B.
Margaroli L.
7-646-4
Krueger M.
Santillan A.[8]
6-47-5
Yang T.
Nolan D.
6-26-3
Banes M.
Jung J.[3]
6-44-66-3
Safwat M.[6]
Bourchier H.
6-46-726-3
Oconnell C.
Kelly D.
7-56-4
Bolt A.
Frawley J.
6-42-66-2
De Minaur A.
Soeda G.[1]
3-66-46-3
Bellotti R.
Satral J.[2]
6-23-1
Nguyen D.
Pasha N.
7-637-61
Rubin N.[7]
Saville L.
7-647-66
Klein B.
Mott B.
6-36-4
Jasika O.
Popko D.
6-37-5