Christopher Oconnell vs Dayne Kelly — Launceston CH Round of 32

Launceston CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Christopher Oconnell
1673ELO
1657Hard ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 February 2017
hard
AUS
Dayne Kelly
35 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLLWW
Oconnell C.
7-5 6-4
Kelly D.
Oconnell C.
762
Kelly D.
540

Christopher Oconnell defeated Dayne Kelly 7-5 6-4 in the Launceston CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Dayne Kelly came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Oconnell C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kelly D.

Kelly D.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Oconnell C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Oconnell C.Kelly D.
20
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Oconnell C.Kelly D.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.1
4.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.7
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 121). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Oconnell C.Kelly D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
49
18
Break points saved·Clear edge
98
75
Break points won·Even
22
21
Deciding sets·Clear edge
38
23
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Rubin N.[7]
Krueger M.
6-06-1
Semi-finals
Rubin N.[7]
Nguyen D.
6-36-2
Krueger M.
Safwat M.[6]
7-54-66-3
Quarter-finals
Nguyen D.
Bellotti R.
6-44-66-0
Rubin N.[7]
Whittington A.[4]
5-76-16-3
Krueger M.
Yang T.
6-47-5
Safwat M.[6]
Bolt A.
7-636-3
R16
Bellotti R.
Purcell M.
4-66-36-2
Nguyen D.
Polmans M.
7-616-4
Whittington A.[4]
Klein B.
6-43-66-3
Rubin N.[7]
Mousley B.
6-46-4
Krueger M.
Jasika O.
6-46-0
Yang T.
Banes M.
3-66-27-5
Safwat M.[6]
Oconnell C.
6-32-66-3
Bolt A.
De Minaur A.
3-66-47-5
R32
Purcell M.
Fanselow S.
4-66-47-65
Polmans M.
King E.
6-736-46-4
Whittington A.[4]
Rola B.
1-67-616-3
Mousley B.
Margaroli L.
7-646-4
Krueger M.
Santillan A.[8]
6-47-5
Yang T.
Nolan D.
6-26-3
Banes M.
Jung J.[3]
6-44-66-3
Safwat M.[6]
Bourchier H.
6-46-726-3
Oconnell C.
Kelly D.
7-56-4
Bolt A.
Frawley J.
6-42-66-2
De Minaur A.
Soeda G.[1]
3-66-46-3
Bellotti R.
Satral J.[2]
6-23-1
Nguyen D.
Pasha N.
7-637-61
Rubin N.[7]
Saville L.
7-647-66
Klein B.
Mott B.
6-36-4
Jasika O.
Popko D.
6-37-5