Omar Jasika vs Dmitry Popko — Launceston CH Round of 32

Launceston CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Omar Jasika
#528ATP
1296ELO
1272Hard ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 February 2017
hard
Dmitry Popko
KAZ
Dmitry Popko
#629ATP
1385ELO
1400Hard ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Jasika O.
6-3 7-5
Popko D.
Jasika O.
672
Popko D.
350

Omar Jasika defeated Dmitry Popko 6-3 7-5 in the Launceston CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Omar Jasika came in ranked #528, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Omar Jasika closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jasika O.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Popko D.

Popko D.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Jasika O.

Serve advantage — Popko D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jasika O.Popko D.
1st serve in·Clear edge
68%
54%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.3
4.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jasika O.Popko D.
Clutch Rating·Even
0
3
Break points saved·Slight edge
47
54
Break points won·Even
13
17
Deciding sets·Even
13
9
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
1
6

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Jasika O.Popko D.
Freshness·
—
86

Popko D.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 31 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Rubin N.[7]
Krueger M.
6-06-1
Semi-finals
Rubin N.[7]
Nguyen D.
6-36-2
Krueger M.
Safwat M.[6]
7-54-66-3
Quarter-finals
Nguyen D.
Bellotti R.
6-44-66-0
Rubin N.[7]
Whittington A.[4]
5-76-16-3
Krueger M.
Yang T.
6-47-5
Safwat M.[6]
Bolt A.
7-636-3
R16
Bellotti R.
Purcell M.
4-66-36-2
Nguyen D.
Polmans M.
7-616-4
Whittington A.[4]
Klein B.
6-43-66-3
Rubin N.[7]
Mousley B.
6-46-4
Krueger M.
Jasika O.
6-46-0
Yang T.
Banes M.
3-66-27-5
Safwat M.[6]
Oconnell C.
6-32-66-3
Bolt A.
De Minaur A.
3-66-47-5
R32
Purcell M.
Fanselow S.
4-66-47-65
Polmans M.
King E.
6-736-46-4
Whittington A.[4]
Rola B.
1-67-616-3
Mousley B.
Margaroli L.
7-646-4
Krueger M.
Santillan A.[8]
6-47-5
Yang T.
Nolan D.
6-26-3
Banes M.
Jung J.[3]
6-44-66-3
Safwat M.[6]
Bourchier H.
6-46-726-3
Oconnell C.
Kelly D.
7-56-4
Bolt A.
Frawley J.
6-42-66-2
De Minaur A.
Soeda G.[1]
3-66-46-3
Bellotti R.
Satral J.[2]
6-23-1
Nguyen D.
Pasha N.
7-637-61
Rubin N.[7]
Saville L.
7-647-66
Klein B.
Mott B.
6-36-4
Jasika O.
Popko D.
6-37-5