Jurgen Melzer vs Norbert Gombos — Budapest CH Round of 16

Budapest CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
AUT
Jurgen Melzer
45 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 February 2017
hard
Norbert Gombos
SVK6
Norbert Gombos
#370ATP
1472ELO
1452Hard ELO
35 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWL
Melzer J.
5-7 6-2 6-2
Gombos N.
Melzer J.
5662
Gombos N.
7221

Jurgen Melzer defeated Norbert Gombos 5-7 6-2 6-2 in the Budapest CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Jurgen Melzer came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Jurgen Melzer extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-10-13ViennaR32hardJurgen Melzer3-6 6-4 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Melzer J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gombos N.

Gombos N.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Melzer J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Melzer J.Gombos N.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.3
4.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (47 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Melzer J.Gombos N.
Clutch Rating·Even
44
41
Break points saved·Even
86
83
Break points won·Clear edge
27
8
Deciding sets·Slight edge
65
70
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
27
36

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Melzer J.Gombos N.
Freshness·
—
79

Gombos N.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Melzer J.
Fucsovics M.
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Melzer J.
Corrie E.
6-47-65
Fucsovics M.
Ruud C.
6-06-0
Quarter-finals
Corrie E.
Maden Y.
6-46-4
Melzer J.
Copil M.[3]
6-46-4
Fucsovics M.
Vanni L.[8]
6-37-5
Ruud C.
Vatutin A.
6-24-67-65
R16
Maden Y.
Kavcic B.
6-33-66-4
Corrie E.
Reuter Y.
4-66-36-4
Copil M.[3]
De Loore J.
6-44-66-1
Melzer J.
Gombos N.[6]
5-76-26-2
Vanni L.[8]
Skugor F.
6-46-3
Fucsovics M.
Bachinger M.
6-36-3
Ruud C.
Basic M.
7-52-66-3
Vatutin A.
Quinzi G.
1-66-26-2
R32
Kavcic B.
Stakhovsky S.[2]
3-66-36-4
Maden Y.
Hanfmann Y.
6-37-64
Corrie E.
Piros Z.
0-66-46-2
Reuter Y.
Donskoy E.[5]
6-44-66-3
Copil M.[3]
Safranek V.
6-16-4
De Loore J.
Sieber M.
6-37-64
Melzer J.
Borsos G.
6-46-2
Gombos N.[6]
Valkusz M.
6-46-2
Vanni L.[8]
Arnaboldi A.
6-36-3
Skugor F.
Ivashka I.
3-67-657-60
Bachinger M.
Fabbiano T.[4]
6-36-3
Ruud C.
Lee D.[7]
7-56-2
Basic M.
Przysiezny M.
6-46-747-61
Quinzi G.
Balazs A.
6-26-3
Fucsovics M.
Giustino L.
6-46-4
Vatutin A.
Djere L.
6-34-0