Marius Copil vs Vaclav Safranek — Budapest CH Round of 32

Budapest CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ROU3
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 February 2017
hard
CZE
Vaclav Safranek
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
Copil M.
6-1 6-4
Safranek V.
Copil M.
662
Safranek V.
140

Marius Copil defeated Vaclav Safranek 6-1 6-4 in the Budapest CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Marius Copil came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending the title. Marius Copil extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-10-17AntwerpQ1hardMarius Copil6-3 6-0

Serve vs return

This season
Copil M.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Safranek V.

Safranek V.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Serve advantage — Copil M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Copil M.Safranek V.
1st serve in·Even
59%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
59%
Return points won·Even
35%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.6
3.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 123). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Copil M.Safranek V.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
47
20
Break points saved·Dominant
91
55
Break points won·Slight edge
3
14
Deciding sets·Clear edge
63
49
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
16

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Melzer J.
Fucsovics M.
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Melzer J.
Corrie E.
6-47-65
Fucsovics M.
Ruud C.
6-06-0
Quarter-finals
Corrie E.
Maden Y.
6-46-4
Melzer J.
Copil M.[3]
6-46-4
Fucsovics M.
Vanni L.[8]
6-37-5
Ruud C.
Vatutin A.
6-24-67-65
R16
Maden Y.
Kavcic B.
6-33-66-4
Corrie E.
Reuter Y.
4-66-36-4
Copil M.[3]
De Loore J.
6-44-66-1
Melzer J.
Gombos N.[6]
5-76-26-2
Vanni L.[8]
Skugor F.
6-46-3
Fucsovics M.
Bachinger M.
6-36-3
Ruud C.
Basic M.
7-52-66-3
Vatutin A.
Quinzi G.
1-66-26-2
R32
Kavcic B.
Stakhovsky S.[2]
3-66-36-4
Maden Y.
Hanfmann Y.
6-37-64
Corrie E.
Piros Z.
0-66-46-2
Reuter Y.
Donskoy E.[5]
6-44-66-3
Copil M.[3]
Safranek V.
6-16-4
De Loore J.
Sieber M.
6-37-64
Melzer J.
Borsos G.
6-46-2
Gombos N.[6]
Valkusz M.
6-46-2
Vanni L.[8]
Arnaboldi A.
6-36-3
Skugor F.
Ivashka I.
3-67-657-60
Bachinger M.
Fabbiano T.[4]
6-36-3
Ruud C.
Lee D.[7]
7-56-2
Basic M.
Przysiezny M.
6-46-747-61
Quinzi G.
Balazs A.
6-26-3
Fucsovics M.
Giustino L.
6-46-4
Vatutin A.
Djere L.
6-34-0