Jurgen Melzer vs Marius Copil — Budapest CH Quarter-final

Budapest CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
AUT
Jurgen Melzer
45 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 February 2017
hard
ROU3
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
Melzer J.
6-4 6-4
Copil M.
Melzer J.
662
Copil M.
440

Jurgen Melzer defeated Marius Copil 6-4 6-4 in the Budapest CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Marius Copil came in defending the title, but Jurgen Melzer had been the form player, winning 1 of their last 4 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Jurgen Melzer edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Melzer J.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Copil M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Melzer J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Melzer J.Copil M.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
35%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.3
8.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (47 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Melzer J.Copil M.
Clutch Rating·Even
44
47
Break points saved·Slight edge
86
91
Break points won·Clear edge
27
3
Deciding sets·Even
65
63
Tiebreaks·Dominant
27
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Melzer J.
Fucsovics M.
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Melzer J.
Corrie E.
6-47-65
Fucsovics M.
Ruud C.
6-06-0
Quarter-finals
Corrie E.
Maden Y.
6-46-4
Melzer J.
Copil M.[3]
6-46-4
Fucsovics M.
Vanni L.[8]
6-37-5
Ruud C.
Vatutin A.
6-24-67-65
R16
Maden Y.
Kavcic B.
6-33-66-4
Corrie E.
Reuter Y.
4-66-36-4
Copil M.[3]
De Loore J.
6-44-66-1
Melzer J.
Gombos N.[6]
5-76-26-2
Vanni L.[8]
Skugor F.
6-46-3
Fucsovics M.
Bachinger M.
6-36-3
Ruud C.
Basic M.
7-52-66-3
Vatutin A.
Quinzi G.
1-66-26-2
R32
Kavcic B.
Stakhovsky S.[2]
3-66-36-4
Maden Y.
Hanfmann Y.
6-37-64
Corrie E.
Piros Z.
0-66-46-2
Reuter Y.
Donskoy E.[5]
6-44-66-3
Copil M.[3]
Safranek V.
6-16-4
De Loore J.
Sieber M.
6-37-64
Melzer J.
Borsos G.
6-46-2
Gombos N.[6]
Valkusz M.
6-46-2
Vanni L.[8]
Arnaboldi A.
6-36-3
Skugor F.
Ivashka I.
3-67-657-60
Bachinger M.
Fabbiano T.[4]
6-36-3
Ruud C.
Lee D.[7]
7-56-2
Basic M.
Przysiezny M.
6-46-747-61
Quinzi G.
Balazs A.
6-26-3
Fucsovics M.
Giustino L.
6-46-4
Vatutin A.
Djere L.
6-34-0