Reilly Opelka vs Sekou Bangoura — San Francisco CH Round of 32

San Francisco CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Reilly Opelka
USA
Reilly Opelka
#131ATP
1749ELO
1734Hard ELO
$325kYTD
$6.0MCAREER
28 yrs · 211 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 February 2017
hard
USA
Sekou Bangoura
#1964ATP
34 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLL
Opelka R.
6-3 6-4
Bangoura S.
Opelka R.
662
Bangoura S.
340

Reilly Opelka defeated Sekou Bangoura 6-3 6-4 in the San Francisco CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Reilly Opelka came in ranked #131.

Key context

  • Match story: Reilly Opelka closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Opelka R.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Bangoura S.

Bangoura S.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Opelka R.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Opelka R.Bangoura S.
86
Serve
—
0
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Opelka R.Bangoura S.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
70%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
28%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
70%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
17.5
3.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 126). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Opelka R.Bangoura S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
63
15
Break points saved·Dominant
100
67
Break points won·Clear edge
1
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
88
29
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
5

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Zhang Z.
Pospisil V.[7]
7-53-66-2
Semi-finals
Zhang Z.
Laaksonen H.[5]
6-47-67
Pospisil V.[7]
Mmoh M.
6-16-2
Quarter-finals
Zhang Z.
Ito T.
6-26-3
Laaksonen H.[5]
Quigley E.
7-646-2
Pospisil V.[7]
Tiafoe F.[1]
6-16-4
Mmoh M.
Kudla D.[8]
2-66-36-4
R16
Zhang Z.
Schnur B.
6-46-2
Ito T.
Polansky P.[6]
7-633-66-4
Quigley E.
Smith J.
2-67-56-3
Laaksonen H.[5]
Ramanathan R.
6-17-61
Kudla D.[8]
Mcdonald M.
7-654-66-2
Mmoh M.
Kukushkin M.[3]
6-36-3
Pospisil V.[7]
Opelka R.
6-756-16-3
Tiafoe F.[1]
Shane R.
7-646-746-2
R32
Ito T.
King D.
7-646-2
Polansky P.[6]
Novikov D.
6-26-2
Smith J.
Donaldson J.[4]
6-37-64
Quigley E.
Smyczek T.
6-34-67-5
Ramanathan R.
Giron M.
2-66-46-4
Laaksonen H.[5]
Barton M.
6-46-3
Kudla D.[8]
Sarmiento R.
6-776-16-4
Mcdonald M.
Coppejans K.
6-26-2
Mmoh M.
Sandgren T.
2-66-47-61
Kukushkin M.[3]
Milojevic N.
7-636-2
Opelka R.
Bangoura S.
6-36-4
Shane R.
Caruso S.
7-636-4
Tiafoe F.[1]
Klahn B.
6-46-4
Zhang Z.
Fritz T.[2]
6-44-66-2
Schnur B.
Ymer E.
7-646-4
Pospisil V.[7]
Trungelliti M.
7-653-66-4