Maverick Banes vs Jason Jung — Launceston CH Round of 32

Launceston CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Maverick Banes
34 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 February 2017
hard
Jason Jung
TPE3
Jason Jung
#896ATP
1420ELO
1389Hard ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLL
Banes M.
6-4 4-6 6-3
Jung J.
Banes M.
6462
Jung J.
4631

Maverick Banes defeated Jason Jung 6-4 4-6 6-3 in the Launceston CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Maverick Banes came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Maverick Banes closed it out in three sets, 6–4 4–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Banes M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Jung J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Banes M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Banes M.Jung J.
1st serve in·Even
60%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
56%
57%
Aces / match·Even
3.3
2.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (102 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Banes M.Jung J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
16
21
Break points saved·Clear edge
41
64
Break points won·Dominant
42
8
Deciding sets·Even
18
21
Tiebreaks·Dominant
38
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Banes M.Jung J.
Freshness·
—
78

Jung J.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Rubin N.[7]
Krueger M.
6-06-1
Semi-finals
Rubin N.[7]
Nguyen D.
6-36-2
Krueger M.
Safwat M.[6]
7-54-66-3
Quarter-finals
Nguyen D.
Bellotti R.
6-44-66-0
Rubin N.[7]
Whittington A.[4]
5-76-16-3
Krueger M.
Yang T.
6-47-5
Safwat M.[6]
Bolt A.
7-636-3
R16
Bellotti R.
Purcell M.
4-66-36-2
Nguyen D.
Polmans M.
7-616-4
Whittington A.[4]
Klein B.
6-43-66-3
Rubin N.[7]
Mousley B.
6-46-4
Krueger M.
Jasika O.
6-46-0
Yang T.
Banes M.
3-66-27-5
Safwat M.[6]
Oconnell C.
6-32-66-3
Bolt A.
De Minaur A.
3-66-47-5
R32
Purcell M.
Fanselow S.
4-66-47-65
Polmans M.
King E.
6-736-46-4
Whittington A.[4]
Rola B.
1-67-616-3
Mousley B.
Margaroli L.
7-646-4
Krueger M.
Santillan A.[8]
6-47-5
Yang T.
Nolan D.
6-26-3
Banes M.
Jung J.[3]
6-44-66-3
Safwat M.[6]
Bourchier H.
6-46-726-3
Oconnell C.
Kelly D.
7-56-4
Bolt A.
Frawley J.
6-42-66-2
De Minaur A.
Soeda G.[1]
3-66-46-3
Bellotti R.
Satral J.[2]
6-23-1
Nguyen D.
Pasha N.
7-637-61
Rubin N.[7]
Saville L.
7-647-66
Klein B.
Mott B.
6-36-4
Jasika O.
Popko D.
6-37-5