Frances Tiafoe vs Di Wu — Dallas CH Round of 16

Dallas CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Frances Tiafoe
USA4
Frances Tiafoe
#17ATP
1918ELO
1861Hard ELO
$1.9MYTD
$18MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 January 2017
hard
CHN
Di Wu
34 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWLLL
Tiafoe F.
6-2 7-6
Wu D.
Tiafoe F.
6772
Wu D.
2650

Frances Tiafoe defeated Di Wu 6-2 7-6 in the Dallas CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Frances Tiafoe came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tiafoe F.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Wu D.

Wu D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Tiafoe F.

Serve advantage — Tiafoe F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tiafoe F.Wu D.
38
Serve
—
37
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tiafoe F.Wu D.
1st serve in·Even
59%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
60%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.0
2.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 132). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tiafoe F.Wu D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
83
4
Break points saved·Dominant
99
37
Break points won·Dominant
57
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
18
Tiebreaks·Dominant
98
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Tiafoe F.Wu D.
Freshness·
82
—

Tiafoe F.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Harrison R.[1]
Fritz T.[2]
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Fritz T.[2]
Kudla D.[6]
6-42-67-62
Harrison R.[1]
Ito T.
6-36-0
Quarter-finals
Fritz T.[2]
Ram R.[7]
6-36-2
Ito T.
Ymer E.
6-46-4
Harrison R.[1]
Trungelliti M.
6-46-1
Kudla D.[6]
Tiafoe F.[4]
7-657-61
R16
Tiafoe F.[4]
Wu D.
6-27-65
Kudla D.[6]
Krajicek A.
7-646-3
Ymer E.
Bangoura S.
6-37-5
Ito T.
Kukushkin M.[3]
4-67-637-66
Trungelliti M.
Sarmiento R.
7-666-1
Harrison R.[1]
Mcdonald M.
6-27-610
Ram R.[7]
Opelka R.
7-647-61
Fritz T.[2]
Giron M.
7-54-66-3
R32
Fritz T.[2]
Zhang Z.
6-46-3
Giron M.
Baker B.
7-656-4
Opelka R.
Caruso S.
6-16-3
Ram R.[7]
Coppejans K.
6-32-66-2
Tiafoe F.[4]
Harrison C.
6-26-1
Wu D.
Sandgren T.
7-656-3
Krajicek A.
Milojevic N.
6-16-3
Kudla D.[6]
Mcgee J.
6-34-66-1
Ymer E.
Smyczek T.[8]
7-666-3
Sarmiento R.
Becker B.[5]
7-57-5
Trungelliti M.
Wood C.
6-27-64
Mcdonald M.
Li Z.
6-46-3
Harrison R.[1]
Quigley E.
6-36-4
Bangoura S.
Molchanov D.
5-76-37-5
Ito T.
Gomez Gb42 A.
6-46-4
Kukushkin M.[3]
Novikov D.
6-46-2